2009/2/11 Jack Mallah jackmal...@yahoo.com
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still don't understand how I could be 30 years old and not 4,
there are a lot more OM of 4 than 30... it is the argument you use for 1000
years old, I don't see why it can hold
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't get it. Why should the measure suddenly decrease at 80 (or 100)
years old ? Why not 30 ? Why not 4 ?
Heart disease. Cancer. Stroke. Degradation of various organs leading to
death. Such ailments are known to strike
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2009/2/11 Jack Mallah jackmal...@yahoo.com mailto:jackmal...@yahoo.com
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
mailto:allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still don't understand how I could be 30 years old and not
4, there are a lot
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total probability, which
implies that the splitting into different quasi-classical subspaces reduces
Brent Meeker wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total probability, which
implies that the splitting into different quasi-classical subspaces reduces
the
measure of each subspace. But there's no
2009/2/11 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
2009/2/11 Jesse Mazer laserma...@hotmail.com
Brent Meeker wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total probability, which
implies that the splitting
2009/2/11 Jesse Mazer laserma...@hotmail.com
Brent Meeker wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total probability, which
implies that the splitting into different quasi-classical subspaces
2009/2/11 Quentin Anciaux
Because the point is to know from a 1st person perspective that it exists a
next subjective moment... if there is, QI holds. Even if in the majority of
universes I'm dead... from 1st perspective I cannot be dead hence the
only moments that count is where I
Jesse Mazer wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total probability, which
implies that the splitting into different quasi-classical subspaces reduces
the
measure of each
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2009/2/11 Jesse Mazer laserma...@hotmail.com
mailto:laserma...@hotmail.com
Brent Meeker wrote:
Indeed there seems to be a conflict between MWI of QM and the
feeling of
consciousness. QM evolves unitarily to preserve total
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still don't understand how I could be 30 years old and not 4, there
are a lot more OM of 4 than 30... it is the argument you use for 1000 years
old, I don't see why it can hold for 30 ?
Quentin, why would the measure of 4
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 06:43:11PM -0800, Jack Mallah wrote:
--- On Mon, 2/9/09, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I still don't understand how I could be 30 years old and not 4, there
are a lot more OM of 4 than 30... it is the argument you use for 1000 years
old, I don't
12 matches
Mail list logo
