Re: Everything need a little more than 0 information

2002-12-01 Thread Russell Standish
Hal Finney wrote: That would be true IF you include descriptions that are infinitely long. Then the set of all descriptions would be of cardinality c. If your definition of a description implies that each one must be finite, then the set of all of them would have cardinality aleph-zero.

Re: Everything need a little more than 0 information

2002-11-29 Thread James N Rose
Gentlemen (and Ladies, if some be present here), I offer you a small bit of wisdom and irony, presented in a bit of humor. Statement of vernacular AND mathematical truth: The universe is an ODD PLACE. (!) [i.e., it is imbalanced and -not- fundamentally symmetric] PROOF: -infinity ---

Re: Everything need a little more than 0 information

2002-11-29 Thread Hal Finney
Russell Standish writes to Bruno Marchal: As you have well pointed out, the set of all descriptions can be computed in c time (c = cardinality of the reals) on an ordinary Universal Turing Machine via the UD. It is, however, a nonclassical model of computation. That doesn't sound right to me.

Re: Everything need a little more than 0 information

2002-11-29 Thread Stephen Paul King
, Stephen - Original Message - From: Hal Finney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re: Everything need a little more than 0 information Russell Standish writes to Bruno Marchal: As you have well pointed out, the set of all