Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-10 Thread John Mikes
On 8/9/07, > > > > On 09/08/2007, at 5:06 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > >> Here's a school that's ahead of Bruno in taking consistency to be > >> part of theology. :-) > >> > >> http://chfbs.org/high_school/high_sch_math.htm > >> > >> > >> Brent Meeker > >> I clicked up the URL: it does not seem

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Brent Meeker
Just back up to the home website: http://chfbs.org/ Brent Meeker Kim Jones wrote: > Could you provide some info on this, please? How can we be sure it > isn't a spoof? Which US Baptist college is this? Can't decipher the > logo... > > cheers, > > Kim Jones > > > > On 09/08/2007, at 5:

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Kim Jones
What is "lobian" apart from la machine, Bruno? Are you referring to "angels" here? Aren't angels machines too? K On 09/08/2007, at 7:03 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Also, if we are machine (or just lobian), we can indeed contemplate > the > consistency of *little part* of math, but cert

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hm I think it is preferable to introduce a few math in a theology course (which can be done by making some precise hypotheses like comp or lobianity) than to introduce theology in math. They are naming and invoking the unnameable! I know it is not always easy to motivate people for m

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Kim Jones
Could you provide some info on this, please? How can we be sure it isn't a spoof? Which US Baptist college is this? Can't decipher the logo... cheers, Kim Jones On 09/08/2007, at 5:06 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > Here's a school that's ahead of Bruno in taking consistency to be > part o