comp (with some nuances).
In november I will have a bit more time, and I could add something
on both van Fraassen-Rovelli and Pratt.
Best,
Bruno
From: Colin Hales
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
Colin,
David seems to understand we are closer than you might think. Here I answer
again to an interesting old post. I am not sure you commented my answer.
On 23 Oct 2010, at 23:37, Colin Hales wrote:
I am pretty sure
From: Colin Hales
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
Hi,
Looks like and interesting read but the initial gloss-over I
had revealed all the usual things that continue to frustrate and
exasperate me
Brent Meeker wrote:
On 10/23/2010 2:37 PM, Colin Hales wrote:
I am pretty sure that there is a profound misinterpretation and/or
unrecognized presupposition deeply embedded in the kinds of
discussion of which Van F and your reply and Bruno's fits. It's so
embedded that there appears to
).
In november I will have a bit more time, and I could add something on
both van Fraassen-Rovelli and Pratt.
Best,
Bruno
From: Colin Hales
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
Hi,
Looks like and interesting
mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
Hi,
Looks like and interesting read but the initial gloss-over I had
revealed all the usual things that continue to frustrate and
exasperate me
Why won't people that attend to these issues do some
@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Colin Hales
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 4:37 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
I am pretty sure that there is a profound misinterpretation and/or
unrecognized presupposition
.
Onward!
Stephen
From: Colin Hales
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:35 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: A paper by Bas C. van Fraassen
Hi,
Looks like and interesting read but the initial gloss-over I had revealed
all the usual things that continue to frustrate
Hi,
Looks like and interesting read but the initial gloss-over I had
revealed all the usual things that continue to frustrate and exasperate
me
Why won't people that attend to these issues do some
neuroscience...where the only example of a real observer exists.?
Why does
9 matches
Mail list logo