Hi John,
On 09 Feb 2010, at 23:50, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno, that was beautiful. (I get moving to read your Plotinus paper)
I just returned from some general repair in my machine (heart stents
implanted) and start to recover from the maze of the zillion drugs.
I wish you a nice recovery.
Bruno, that was beautiful. (I get moving to read your Plotinus paper)
I just returned from some general repair in my machine (heart stents
implanted) and start to recover from the maze of the zillion drugs.
I wrote a piece on Science-Religion (2003) which I find close to your added
(single) lines
Sorry I 'sent' again my note already on list.
I wanted to add to it to Bruno:
googgling YOUR Plotinus brought up my discussion about it with you 4 years
ago.
I did not 'think it in' (memory!) because - as I detected now again - it has
too many (formal) religious connotations for me.
I want to
Le 02-févr.-10, à 22:29, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Feb 2010, at 12:07, w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz
mailto:w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz wrote (FOR list) :
The problem with both groups is that both have a tendency to forget
that both Science and Religion are
-
From: Bruno Marchal
To: fabric-of-real...@yahoogroups.com
Cc: everything-list List
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 2:24 PM
Subject: Re: A parable.
On 01 Feb 2010, at 12:07, w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz wrote (FOR list) :
The problem with both groups is that both have
On 01 Feb 2010, at 12:07, w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz wrote (FOR
list) :
The problem with both groups is that both have a tendency to forget
that both Science and Religion are constructs
They are not. Religion is a construct, science is a method.
Category mistake.
Human religion
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Feb 2010, at 12:07, w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz
mailto:w.tay...@math.canterbury.ac.nz wrote (FOR list) :
The problem with both groups is that both have a tendency to forget
that both Science and Religion are constructs
They are not. Religion is a construct,
7 matches
Mail list logo
