In response to a question:
I first tried to show that cascade discontinuities are necessary.
Second assume these discontinuities leave behind a split rather than just a
shift.
The assumption results in an additional contradictory situation giving two
running contradictions. Result - splits r
Dear John:
Below I have slightly rewritten my argument along the lines I had
originally intended - the first effort was too rushed. The rewrite may
answer your question.
At 2/12/01, you wrote:
>Hal, you wrote (among lots of other things):
> > 2) But the other universe also has to stop given t
Hal, you wrote (among lots of other things):
> 2) But the other universe also has to stop given the fixed FAS complexity
> i.e. another new running contradiction.
Can you discern - after the split - which is "the other"?
(excuse me for this question for a situation which I do not condone at all).
3 matches
Mail list logo
