Re: Fwd: The final TOE?

[Felix Hoenikker]

 I'm afraid I don't understand how your idea qualitatively predicts all
 features of GR without QCD or QFT. or what it means for (Feynmann diagram?)
 loops to have net entanglement coming out. I think you need to be more
 explicit and precise (e.g. mathematical). The idea that GR can be explained
 in terms of QFT and entropic fluctuations has been around a long time (c.f.
 Sakarov). Here's a recent post of from a friend on the question:


I read the message you posted, and it seems like what I'm saying has
some similarity to what I'm saying: gravity and the other 3
fundamental forces are linked together.  But I'm actually saying the
opposite of what he is: rather than the other forces being fundamental
and gravity arising from quantum fuzziness, gravity is fundamental
and the other forces arise from locally looping topology, which are
more or less the strings of string theory.  However, the strings
do not have some fixed number of dimension, but depend on the
microscale topology of local space, which in turn depend on the
initial conditions during the big bang.

My theory also produces a testable prediction: no black holes truly
exist, because no singularity can truly form.  Therefore every
apparent event horizon is really a separation of two universes,
where the outside universe is entangled geometrically with the inside
universe. The Hubble volume is sitting inside of an expanding
supermassive black hole, of another universe. However, because of
uncertainty about the macrostate of the universe, this means the
outside universe is effectively in a superposition of all possible
universes consistent with our observations. Equivalently, every
classical black hole is really in a microscopic superposition of all
possible states consistent with the outside world.

However, the Hubble volume in not truly closed: it receives
information one photon at a time from the outside in the form of
cosmic background radiation, which is information being about the
prior state of the otherwise casually disconnected universe, i.e. the
CMB and other parts of the observable universe outside our Hubble
volume. Similarity, every classical black hole must leak information
to the outside world in the form of photons, i.e. Hawking radiation.

Equivalence between the CMB and Hawking radiation implies that space
must be compressed within a black hole in order to fit all the
information that is to leak out later, i.e. length contraction.  Also,
since information comes out of a black hole more slowly than it goes
in, this implies time dilation.  This is what I mean when I say that
my theory retrodicts the qualitative features of QM and GR.

Finally, my theory is that gravity is the only true force, but that
the other forces arise through photons going through microscopic black
holes at every point in space.  In fact, since black holes do not
truly exist in my theory, *every* point in space is, in theory, a
black hole, the topology of which depends on the initial conditions in
the Big Bang in our section of the universe.

Does that make any more sense? Please let me know if it does not.

F.H.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

Re: Fwd: The final TOE?

[meekerdb]

On 6/11/2011 1:20 AM, Felix Hoenikker wrote:

Hi Russell,

Do you have any further thoughts on my idea that entanglement and
gravity are linked together? I really believe that this is the
solution to the EPR paradox and the black hole information paradox,
but I haven't heard any qualified opinion on the subject yet.

Thank you!
F.H.
   


I'm afraid I don't understand how your idea qualitatively predicts all 
features of GR without QCD or QFT. or what it means for (Feynmann 
diagram?) loops to have net entanglement coming out. I think you need 
to be more explicit and precise (e.g. mathematical). The idea that GR 
can be explained in terms of QFT and entropic fluctuations has been 
around a long time (c.f. Sakarov). Here's a recent post of from a friend 
on the question:


===
Cosmological Constant in Induced Gravity





The recent work of Velinde, Padmanabhan and others have provided 
significant support for the proposal by Sakharov that gravity, rather 
than being a fundamental force in nature is the result of the quantum 
fuzziness of all the other forces in nature. That is gravity naturally 
results from the uncertainty principle when applied to the zero point 
energy of the quantum fields.




In QFT this zero point energy is predicted to be many orders of 
magnitudes greater than is actually observed, this is the famous 
cosmological constant problem. Recently, it has been proposed that the 
calculation of the zero point energy of quantum fields can be corrected 
by including a ghost” sector where there are particles which give an 
opposite action to gravity. Based on this idea, the vacuum state is 
balanced between the action density of the normal and ghost sector, 
canceling out the predicted vacuum energy. In several models proposed 
Dark energy results from a small imbalance between the normal and ghost 
sectors as a function of the future horizon in the Hubble volume, 
analogous to negative vacuum energy density that is expected around the 
event horizon of a black hole. We can write the equation for this as;




rho_vac= chi^a*integral Dw L(+) + chi_a*Integral Dw L(-)



Therefore, it might be useful to turn Einstein's General Relativity on 
its head , and express the curvature of space time as a function of a 
local and global cosmological constant, that is a shift in the vacuum 
energy density of the vacuum.




Given the fundamental set of equations from General Relativity



R_mu,nu -(1/2)*R*g_mu,nu = kappa*T_mu,nu =G_mu,nu



We can write



G_mu,nu= kappa*{ T_mu,nu ( matter) - T_mu,nu(vacuum)}



G_mu,nu={ Lambda( local) + Lambda(global)} *g_mu,nu





Here we can say that the energy of the gravitational field, as is Dark 
Energy, is stored in the vacuum. In any region of space we can say there 
is a density of energy proportional to minus the square of the gravity 
field.




Rho_vac(local) =- - k*g^2



Where k is a constant of proportion. Using Einstein's equation for the 
CC we can easily define k.








g= Lambda*c^2*R/3



We can define R as the Rindler Horizon



R= sqrt[3/lambda]



Therefore



kappa*rho_loc= - 3*g^2/c^4



rho_loc= - {3/(8*pi*G)}*g^2







Given



dS/dE= 1/(K_b*T) = (1/F)*(dS/dR) = 1/(K_b*T)





Where K_b is the Boltzmann constant and S is entropy related to the 
gravity field.




F= (dS/dR)*K_b*T





Given the Bekenstein Bound



S= 2*pi*R*m*c/hbar



And the Davies -Unruh equation



K_b*T= g*hbar/ (2*pi*c)





We get



F= m*g



A significant problem with this approach is the expected SUSY cutoff for 
the ZPE. Ideally this model can hopefully be combined with a cut off at 
the Planck scale, not the SUSY scale. This problem becomes even more 
severe in models where SUSY breaks at low energy. One possibility is 
that there are string modes unaffected by SUSY which can bring the 
cutoff to the Planck scale or the some scale close to the Planck scale. 
The upper KK spectrum might be a good candidate. There may also be mass 
splitting that evade the SUSY symmetry in the high energy symmetry 
breaking events such as the GUT scale or even the Planck scale. Or 
outside the string paradigm SUSY may not be symmetry of nature, though 
this seems unlikely given the effect on the inclusion of SUSY in the 
calculations of the running couplings.




Bob Zannelli




Brent


-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Hoenikkerfhoenikk...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 3:03 AM
Subject: The final TOE?
To: Everything Listeverything-list@googlegroups.com


Hi all,

Consider the following fully general way of saying this is the
following: quantum mechanics and general relativity are symmetrically
the exact same theory, modulo the additional bit of information
that quantum entanglement reduces net gravitational energy.  This is
the EXACT answer to the EPR paradox, and all paradoxes about
singularities, and consistent with our picture of reality in every
respect, as it necessarily must be since it follows