Marchal wrote:
Russell Standish wrote:
I raised this very issue in Why Occams Razor, and came to the
conclusion that the only satisfactory interpreter is the observer
itself.
And so the question resumes into 'what is the observer itself'.
I propose the answer 'the self-referentially
Russell Standish wrote:
I raised this very issue in Why Occams Razor, and came to the
conclusion that the only satisfactory interpreter is the observer
itself.
And so the question resumes into 'what is the observer itself'.
I propose the answer 'the self-referentially sound Lobian machine'
is not too humble, I can say modestly.
John Mikes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pages.prodigy.net/jamikes;
- Original Message -
From: Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Logically possible universes and Occam's
3 matches
Mail list logo
