Citeren Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net:
On 9/25/2012 11:46 AM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Roger,
My idea about this is that the Moon and that we landed on it exists
in parallel with the Moon not existing or existing but we not
landing on it, or we already having a base on the oon
, rclo...@verizon.net
9/25/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: smitra
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark
On 9/26/2012 6:45 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
All these phisicalists considerations are extremely interesting, but
we can not fall in the temptation to consider them an exhaustive
notions of untimate Truth. These considerations take phenomenons as
things occurring in the external reality,
On 9/25/2012 3:48 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Yes, and these micro-branches are effectively classical because the system is entangled
with a large number of environmental degrees of freedom. Still, you can't identify a
conscious observer with a particular micro-branch, you need to consider a
On 9/26/2012 3:45 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
All these phisicalists considerations are extremely interesting, but we can not fall in
the temptation to consider them an exhaustive notions of untimate Truth. These
considerations take phenomenons as things occurring in the external reality, when
But mind can agree also in things that are not phisical. and these things
are much more important for life. Almost all the higuer concepts that we
manage in daily life are non material. We are now talking about existence
and truth for example, that upto my knowledge are not material. These non
On 9/26/2012 11:27 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
But mind can agree also in things that are not phisical. and these things are much more
important for life. Almost all the higuer concepts that we manage in daily life are non
material.
People agree on particular statements being true
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 12:59:07
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
?
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
?
? I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that you
are the only
. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 12:59:07
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
?
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
?
? I
, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the only observer involved
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the only
the following content -
From: smitra
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip
men on it ?
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
9/25/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: smitra
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12
On 9/25/2012 11:46 AM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Hi Roger,
My idea about this is that the Moon and that we landed on it exists in
parallel with the Moon not existing or existing but we not landing on
it, or we already having a base on the oon etc. etc. etc. Then which
of these possibilities
- Receiving the following content -
From: smitra
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-09-24, 23:04:51
Subject: Re: Nonsense!
Citeren Stephen P. King :
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the only observer involved. Such nonsense! Considering that
there are a HUGE number of observers of
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the only observer involved. Such nonsense! Considering that there
are
On 9/24/2012 12:59 PM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.net mailto:stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise
Hi John
This crater has been observed, so there are a current observed phenomenon
about this crater: our memory of it.
I observe that others had observed it, and I trust these people. This
indirect account is also an observation . I believe because I trust these
people and trust science. But the
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that you are the
only observer involved. Such nonsense! Considering
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise
that you are the only
Citeren Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the only observer involved. Such nonsense! Considering
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is
On 9/24/2012 11:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is
On 9/24/2012 11:04 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I expected better from you! This quip is based on the premise that
you are the
On 9/24/2012 8:51 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
If I don't observe it, then it doesn't matter who/what else observes something, the
rest of the universe is still a superposition. It doesn't matter whether or not an
interference pattern can be detected.
Saibal
Dear Saibal,
If you are
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I
On 9/24/2012 8:57 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark wrote:
Thus the moon does not exist when you are not looking at it.
Hi John,
I
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 8:57 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark
On 9/24/2012 11:55 PM, meekerdb wrote:
Or it's Chris Fuch's instrumental Bayesianism which regards QM as just
a way of representing one's knowledge of systems.
If Chris can extract Bell's theorem from the Bayesian statistics, that
would be amazing! I consider QM to be a theory of observers, I
On 9/25/2012 12:05 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:57 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 12:02 PM, John Clark
On 9/25/2012 12:25 AM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 8:57 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P.
On 9/24/2012 9:25 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 8:57 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 9/24/2012 11:17 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 9/24/2012 8:02 PM, smi...@zonnet.nl wrote:
Citeren meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net:
On 9/24/2012 9:28 AM, Stephen P.
34 matches
Mail list logo
