On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
Come on, the guy believe in Aristotelian
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:40:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On 27 March 2014 04:00, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:40:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:35:18 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 27 March 2014 04:00, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
On Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:40:40 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 26 Mar 2014, at 01:21, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014
2014-03-25 1:46 GMT+01:00 LizR lizj...@gmail.com:
He suggests quantum computers can't be simulated (probably a lot more
slowly) by classical computers. I thought they could?
Then he's wrong, because quantum computers can't compute more than a turing
machine...
Quentin
On 25 March 2014
On Monday, March 24, 2014 9:15:04 PM UTC, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
He gives six evidences.
First, he falls for quantum pseudoscience.
Second, he says that he personally failed to make AI when he tried and
incorrectly implies that difficulty means impossibility.
Third, he brings up the hard
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:56:37 AM UTC, ghi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 24, 2014 9:15:04 PM UTC, Gabriel Bodeen wrote:
He gives six evidences.
First, he falls for quantum pseudoscience.
Second, he says that he personally failed to make AI when he tried and
incorrectly
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
Come on, the guy believe in Aristotelian theology, clearly without
knowing it, and he believes that a computer is material, etc. Then his
argument is along the
On 25 Mar 2014, at 01:46, LizR wrote:
He suggests quantum computers can't be simulated (probably a lot
more slowly) by classical computers. I thought they could?
I think he is just unclear.
To be sure a classical computer *can* simulate a quantum computer,
albeit very slowly. But the 1p
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:13:26 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 25 March 2014 07:36, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
javascript:wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
He could make similar arguments claiming consciousness is not
On 26 March 2014 10:59, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, March 24, 2014 5:13:26 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 25 March 2014 07:36, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-
is-not-a-computation-2
He could
On Tuesday, March 25, 2014 11:42:03 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Mar 2014, at 21:36, Craig Weinberg wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
Come on, the guy believe in Aristotelian theology, clearly without knowing
it, and he
On 25 March 2014 07:36, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/consciousness-is-not-a-computation-2
He could make similar arguments claiming consciousness is not chemistry.
--
Stathis Papaioannou
--
You received this message because you are
He gives six evidences.
First, he falls for quantum pseudoscience.
Second, he says that he personally failed to make AI when he tried and
incorrectly implies that difficulty means impossibility.
Third, he brings up the hard problem and uses it to make an argument from
ignorance.
Fourth, he says
14 matches
Mail list logo
