On 09 Nov 2012, at 09:37, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Dear Bruno and other loyal followers of the list,
I had a thought tonight -- half baked and somewhat vague, but
nevertheless I thought relevant to your discussions here...
Is it not true, on the basis of what you laid out in Sane2004, that
there is a necessarily inverse relationship between omnipotence and
omniscience?
Yes. Above universality, or Löbianity, something like that happens. I
just sent a post to Quentin which gives an hint, at least that some
sort of omniscience, or just science/knowledge might be possible, but
then only in a sufficiently disconnected form, above sharing
computations. OK. It is vague, and as I understand it, it is only
consistent with comp, but not necessary with it, or derivable from it.
For consider, the UDA, whatever it may be, has the infinite power to
continue to crank out the algorithim. We, as admittedly self-
consistent and yet ignorant of the fact of our self-consistency,
have the ability to be omniscient (in the sense that we know the
math that leads to our lack of omniscience and yet implies a
universal unfolding of every possibility, all of which you will be
there to witness)
Oh yes. Here you are using a more restricted notion of omniscience
than the one I have taken just above. Your definition is closer to the
one used in logic (the "knowledge of the consequences of our beliefs).
I guess you mean the UD (the universal dovetailer). the A is for
Argument (based on the UD). Just a detail.
yet utterly unable to interfere with the omnipotence of the UDA,
which continues cranking out its various arithmetical possibilities
through its own omnipotence, utterly oblivious of the subjectivity
(ies) involved.
OK. That makes sense. I think that what you say might be derivable
from comp, and perhaps even more general. Already theologians have
argued that a God knowing really everything could not have (free)
will, nor real power. And I am not sure what could a God really know,
in the case it has *all power*.
The usual relation between power and knowledge might break above some
threshold, where a more complex tradeoff might develop.
Nice insight,
Bruno
I'm looking forward to all of your responses for the pleasure of
learning about this stuff...
Thanks for all being so smart and lucid, even when you do have
opinions I don't necessarily agree with (looking at you, John Clark)
Cheers,
Dan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/everything-list/-/TYkiuVIVuSIJ
.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.