On 7/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi all. I am posting a "want ad" for a QM formalist who is > very conversant in the mathematical formalism. here is the proposal: > > over the last few years I have developed an ad hoc theory that > I believe comes very close to the QM formalism. this theory is > classical & local. it is very easily visualized & the mathematics
How do you overcome the fact that local realistic theories are shown not to be able to reproduce the predictions of QM? Or is this what you mean by "very close"? Without entanglement, I'd say that it's not close enough. In fact, it has been shown already that one can derive many of the counterintuitive features of QM from a classical description. Eric.
