Re: Quntum waves are probability (mathemaqtical) waves, not physical waves

2013-01-13 Thread Bruno Marchal


On 12 Jan 2013, at 15:45, Telmo Menezes wrote:


Hi Roger,

Sure, neither do I.
But if you preform the double slit experience you will see physical  
wave-like patters of interference. If it quacks like a duck...
I'm not a materialist and I have no problem with the idea of the  
physical world being a dream. But I also believe that all  
experiences are equally real, including dreams. Including the  
literal dreams we have when we sleep. So I believe in the physical  
world without being a materialist.


And that follows from the comp (or weakened) assumption. But then the  
physical can be redefined, as many things remains physical, even if  
not fundamentally so. In that case the quantum waves are physical, as  
they have observable effects. They are as much physical than particles  
and planets.


I am not sure that Roger is open to conceive a dream form of  
idealism (itself relying only on arithmetic).


Also, with comp, you can always recover a form of local physicalism,  
by lowering the substitution level. Comp entails (I think) that we can  
lower down the substitution level ad infinitum, so ~ comp is  
guarantied to remain consistent for ever.


Bruno







On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net  
wrote:

Hi Telmo Menezes


I don't pretend to be a physicist, but I do know that
quantum waves are probability functions.  There are
the radius and time t in the Schroedinger equation,
so there must be some correpondence to the physical world,
but nothing physical is waving.

So suppose we have a physical box.  The probability
waves have to conform to the dimensions of the box, but
they are ghost-like waves of probability.



[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/12/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-12, 07:01:01
Subject: Re: MWI as an ontological error, it should be TwoAspects  
Theory



Hi Roger,


How can you have a wave without some notion of spatial/temporal  
dimensions?




On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Roger Clough  wrote:

Hi everything-list,

I don't believe that Descartes would accept the MWI.
Here's why:

I think that the ManyWorldsInterpretation of QM is incorrect,
due to the mistaken notion (IMHO) that quantum waves
are physical waves, so that everything is physical and materialistic.

This seems to deny quantum weirdness observed
in the two-slit experiment. Seemingly if both the wave
and the photon are physical, there should be nothing weird
happening.

My own view is that the weirdness arises because the
waves and the photons are residents of two completely
different but interpenetrating worlds, where:

1) the photon is a resident of the physical world,
where by physical I mean (along with Descartes)
extended in space,

2) the quantum wave in nonphysical, being a resident of
the nonphysical world (the world of mind), which has no
extension in space.

Under these conditions, there is no need
to create an additional physical world, since each
can exist as aspects of the the same world,
one moving in spactime and being physical, the other, like
mind, moving simulataneously in the nonphysical world
beyond spacetime.

[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/12/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en 
.





--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en 
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en 
.




--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
Groups Everything List group.

To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en 
.


http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, 

Re: Quntum waves are probability (mathemaqtical) waves, not physical waves

2013-01-12 Thread Telmo Menezes
Hi Roger,

Sure, neither do I.
But if you preform the double slit experience you will see physical
wave-like patters of interference. If it quacks like a duck...
I'm not a materialist and I have no problem with the idea of the physical
world being a dream. But I also believe that all experiences are equally
real, including dreams. Including the literal dreams we have when we sleep.
So I believe in the physical world without being a materialist.


On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:

 Hi Telmo Menezes


 I don't pretend to be a physicist, but I do know that
 quantum waves are probability functions.  There are
 the radius and time t in the Schroedinger equation,
 so there must be some correpondence to the physical world,
 but nothing physical is waving.

 So suppose we have a physical box.  The probability
 waves have to conform to the dimensions of the box, but
 they are ghost-like waves of probability.



 [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
 1/12/2013
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
 - Receiving the following content -
 From: Telmo Menezes
 Receiver: everything-list
 Time: 2013-01-12, 07:01:01
 Subject: Re: MWI as an ontological error, it should be TwoAspects Theory


 Hi Roger,


 How can you have a wave without some notion of spatial/temporal dimensions?



 On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Roger Clough  wrote:

 Hi everything-list,

 I don't believe that Descartes would accept the MWI.
 Here's why:

 I think that the ManyWorldsInterpretation of QM is incorrect,
 due to the mistaken notion (IMHO) that quantum waves
 are physical waves, so that everything is physical and materialistic.

 This seems to deny quantum weirdness observed
 in the two-slit experiment. Seemingly if both the wave
 and the photon are physical, there should be nothing weird
 happening.

 My own view is that the weirdness arises because the
 waves and the photons are residents of two completely
 different but interpenetrating worlds, where:

 1) the photon is a resident of the physical world,
 where by physical I mean (along with Descartes)
 extended in space,

 2) the quantum wave in nonphysical, being a resident of
 the nonphysical world (the world of mind), which has no
 extension in space.

 Under these conditions, there is no need
 to create an additional physical world, since each
 can exist as aspects of the the same world,
 one moving in spactime and being physical, the other, like
 mind, moving simulataneously in the nonphysical world
 beyond spacetime.

 [Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
 1/12/2013
 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.




 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.

 --
 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
 Everything List group.
 To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
 everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
 For more options, visit this group at
 http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.



-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
Everything List group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en.