Hi Jason Resch
There is and cannot be two identical uploaded minds
unless you are me.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/26/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-25, 09:37:35
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Against Mechanism
Well if two people have the same mind and identity, then might they share the
same soul (at least for a moment)?
Jason
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Roger Clough
Hi Jason,
I should have that if those two people can shake hands,
they cannot be identical.
- Have received the following content -
Sender: Roger Clough
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-26, 08:27:06
Subject: Re: Re: Against Mechanism
Hi Jason Resch
There is and cannot
-
*From:* Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-12-24, 11:13:17
*Subject:* Re: Re: Against Mechanism
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.netwrote:
Hi Jason Resch
Since 1p has the property
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Jason Resch
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-24, 11:13:17
Subject: Re: Re: Against Mechanism
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Jason
Hi Jason Resch
Since 1p has the property of perspective,
and no two people can be at the same place at the
same time, 3p has multiple perspectives.
That is the only multiworld theory that I can
believe in.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/24/2012
Forever is a long time,
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Jason Resch
Since 1p has the property of perspective,
and no two people can be at the same place at the
same time,
But could there be two places that are identical to each other which
contain the same first person
Hi Jason Resch
What does physics (and multiple world theory) have to do with
emulating human thinking ? Physics is deterministic, human thought
is not.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
11/30/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Physics is deterministic,
I said it before I'll say it again, it's astonishing how many people expect
to make deep philosophical discoveries while remaining totally ignorant
about what science has accomplished since the year 1900,
Hi meekerdb
I missed the thought experiment, but IMHO thought is an intentioned
expression of some kind. Intentioned means that there is a living self to
do the intentioning. Then one might think of thinking as a paste board on which
one can paste and manipulate representations of the
Bruno,
I think that one contention of comp is that imagination
plays no role in discovery. But what is covered has to be
imagined at least in part to begin with. That argues against
comp fairly strongly.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
11/24/2012
Forever is a long time, especially
Hi Jason Resch
My apologies if I step on toes here, I'm just relying
on experience, but avoiding answering questions,
together with changing the subject, seem to be the
hallmarks of liberalism.
It's uncanny.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
11/9/2012
Forever is a long time, especially
Hi meekerdb
The dilemma is that 1p is subjective and hence solipsistic, but when spoken
about it is
objective (3p, 2p; he, or you).
And as far as dualisms go, the only important one is subjective/objective.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
11/5/2012
Forever is a long time, especially
Hi Stephen P. King
Good. That is another way to define objective (public).
Whereas 1p is personal and always private.
If 1p is communicated, it becomes 3p.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
11/5/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the
14 matches
Mail list logo
