Re: Re: Male Proof and female acceptance of proof

Hi Roger, Then my friend is either blasphemous or the church has evolved since then. Recent history of the church suggests that it evolves but rather conservatively. Richard On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Richard Ruquist > > According to Aquinas. God IS intelligence.

Re: Re: Male Proof and female acceptance of proof

Hi Richard Ruquist According to Aquinas. God IS intelligence. Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 8/24/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list

Re: Re: Male Proof and female acceptance of proof

Hi Stephen P. King No, God communes with us (and the entire universe) and we also commune with him, depending on our clarity of "vision" and intelligence, and perhaps desire, don't know yet. According to Lutheran orthodoxy (L was a Lutheran), God, since He causes all, can cause us to commune w

Re: Re: Male Proof and female acceptance of proof

Hi Stephen P. King True, materials don't actually interact in Idealism, but the Supreme intelligence insures that the same result happens. In other words, you can't tell the difference. So at least in one place Leibniz says, "True, they don't actually interact, because ideas as substances canno

Re: Re: Male Proof and female acceptance of proof

Hi Bruno Marchal Could you explain a little about Bp & p duality ? Are they both analytic, or does one of them us synthetic logic ? Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 8/24/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so everything could function." - Receiving the fo