Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-12-01 Thread Roger Clough
:28:31 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/30/2012 10:02 AM, Roger Clough wrote: And a transcendent truth could be arithmetic truth or the truth of necessary logic. True in logic and formal mathematics is just marker T that is preserved by the rules of inference. In applications

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-30 Thread Roger Clough
. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-02, 18:20:11 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/2/2012 1:23 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Are you familiar with Jaakko Hintikka's ideas? I am using his concept

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-30 Thread Roger Clough
content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-30, 11:17:12 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/30/2012 9:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Hintakka's concept of truth is what is called pragmatic truth, or scientific truth. It's the same

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-05 Thread Roger Clough
- Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-03, 10:18:16 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/3/2012 8:03 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 03 Nov 2012, at 11:46, Stephen P. King wrote: On 11/3/2012 5:18 AM, Bruno Marchal

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-05 Thread Roger Clough
-05, 13:39:57 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/5/2012 1:14 PM, Roger Clough wrote: Hi Stephen P. King Plato in the end confessed that the best he could offer was a likely story. I see no reason to doubt his authority. Nor of the Bible, for that matter. Dear Roger

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-03 Thread Roger Clough
Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm 2012/11/2 Stephen P. King On 11/2/2012 1:23 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I can understand these symbols because there is at least a way to physically implement them. Those notion have nothing to do with physical implementation. ? ? So your

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-03 Thread Roger Clough
...@verizon.net 11/3/2012 Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-02, 18:12:19 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/2/2012 1:23 PM, Bruno Marchal

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-03 Thread Roger Clough
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Stephen P. King Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-11-02, 18:16:09 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/2/2012 1:23 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: You are the one saying

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-11-03 Thread Roger Clough
: everything-list Time: 2012-11-02, 23:17:40 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 11/2/2012 8:25 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: Either you can have emerging properties of nothing or you can't. Either there is infinite regress or not, whatever is true (and one or the other is), it's

Re: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm

2012-10-31 Thread Roger Clough
is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: meekerdb Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-10-30, 14:50:24 Subject: Re: Numbers in the Platonic Realm On 10/30/2012 10:39 AM, Stephen P. King wrote: On 10/30/2012 12:51 PM, Bruno