On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:38 AM, spudboy100 via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
Well, my question is, are you automatically, dismissing jihadi terrorism
as a chimera, a false threat, a non-issue?
http://reason.com/archives/2011/09/06/how-scared-of-terrorism-should
Well, my question is, are you automatically, dismissing jihadi
terrorism as a chimera, a false threat, a non-issue?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Well, my question is, are you automatically, dismissing jihadi terrorism as
a chimera, a false threat, a non-issue?
My answer: you are automatically assuming that it is.
--
You
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
Chris, nobody in power shares my love for global war, as you put it,
but I am very logical in noting the decline of American effectiveness,
and prowess. The world is soon becoming, a No Country for Old Men sort
of place, thats less free and more dangerous. A weakend US now invites
attack, but
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 5:40 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: Re: Re: American Intelligence
I am suspecting, based on intelligence made public,using the old Claude
Shannon method
Chris, so how will you be able to live with yourself, if, say, you
cannot budge me from my horrible views? Secondly, you are not a US
citizen, are you? How will you control America if you cannot even
control, influence, or browbeat me? Just curious.
--
You received this message because you
Chris, so how will you be able to live with yourself, if, say, you
cannot budge me from my horrible views? Secondly, you are not a US
citizen, are you? How will you control America if you cannot even
control, influence, or browbeat me? Just curious.
--
You received this message because you
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2014 5:04 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: RE: RE: American Intelligence
Chris, so how will you be able to live with yourself, if, say, you
: Chaotic Inflation
Receiver:
theoretical_phys...@yahoogroups.com,4dwor...@yahoogroups.com,theoretical_physics_bo...@yahoogroups.com,theoretical_phys...@yahoogroups.com
Time: 2013-08-05, 04:43:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [Theoretical_Physics] Re:
[4DWorldx]Fw:Re:Re:[Theoretical_Physics_Board] OK
-
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
thru
mind (whatever that is).
etc. as I frequently but ineffectively try to correct.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 09:37:42
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Dear Roger,
Only 4d
Hi Alberto G. Corona
My understanding is that the block universe is the physical universe,
so it does not include the world of mind.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from
content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
In the world of the mind, that is, in what we call reality, it causes
everithing because causality is another phenomenon introduced by the mind
(1p
-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind and in it is written all
possible futures and pasts based on comp and quantum mechanics
as well as info on what
.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-03, 07:19:51
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
Roger,
I think the block universe (not quite accurate terminology)
is actually the 4-dimensional quantum mind
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and therefore part of the mind. This includes comp up
thru quantum mechanics. Only 4 dimensions for example of the 11d
universe
of mind.
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2013-02-02, 14:14:51
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
In the world of the mind, that is, in what
Straw dog there is no mention of a separation
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and
Hi Russell Standish
Fine.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-01, 16:54:48
Subject: Re: Re: [Metadiscussion] Off topic posting on the everything-list
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 11:30:39AM -0500, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Does your version of mind actually do anything ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Alberto G. Corona
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-02-02, 04:43:54
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
I do think that a block universe can contain minds
Hi Telmo Menezes
By material I mean physical. Decartes similarly defines
the physical as being extended in space. Mathematics
is not extended in space, so is nonphysical. A Turing machine
is conceived of as having a tape with holes in it,
but it can be used mathematically without physically
On Saturday, February 2, 2013 9:10:49 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
By material I mean physical. Decartes similarly defines
the physical as being extended in space. Mathematics
is not extended in space, so is nonphysical. A Turing machine
is conceived of as having a tape
In the world of the mind, that is, in what we call reality, it causes
everithing because causality is another phenomenon introduced by the mind
(1p)
In the timeless view, there is no causality buy casualty Viewed from above
in a broad perspective, then to cause something is to select it, so
Hi Terren Suydam
Faith is a gift we are unworthy of.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Terren Suydam
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 14:21:17
Subject: Re: Re: Hateful
Hi Roger,
What else is it?
If you say it is the arbiter of morality, then that too can
Hi John Mikes
It didn't feel good.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Mikes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-30, 17:45:12
Subject: Re: Re: Re: The fairness argument and women in the infantry
Roger: it is obvious that you have not understand a word of my
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Terren Suydam
Faith is a gift we are unworthy of.
Whatever floats your boat.
Terren
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com
*Receiver:* everything-list
Hi John Mikes
That's the argument of the Far Left, that miltary strength
induces our enemies to attack us, so we should cut back on
defense spending. And any defensive actions we have made
in the past only count against us.
Since we are dealing with fanatics. you could be right,
but my
Hi Alberto G. Corona
Not to worry.
Since, along with Leibniz (see his Theodicy) I believe that everything
is caused (sometimes unpreferably) by God, then faith is a gift, and,
contrary to Billy Graham, cannot be invoked by man. You cannot
decide to choose for Christ. You can however turn it
Hi Richard Ruquist
Consciousness is not a force that might do things.
It is what allows us to perceive and know things.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-29, 20:39:40
Subject: Re: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:26:51 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi John Mikes
That's the argument of the Far Left, that miltary strength
induces our enemies to attack us, so we should cut back on
defense spending. And any defensive actions we have made
in the past only count
Roger: it is obvious that you have not understand a word of my post. Did it
feel good to mention it as far left? My experience is balanced, I was a
victim of right and left (and also of the so called middle) in my latest 75
years of active life on 3 continents.
Please try to understand what you
On Wednesday, January 30, 2013 5:45:12 PM UTC-5, JohnM wrote:
Roger: it is obvious that you have not understand a word of my post. Did
it feel good to mention it as far left? My experience is balanced, I was
a victim of right and left (and also of the so called middle) in my latest
75
Hi John Clark
No, I let science be science and religion be religion.
Different languages, different meanings. You're confusing the two.
- Receiving the following content -
From: John Clark
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-25, 11:29:01
Subject: Re: Re: Martin Luther on
On Friday, January 25, 2013 1:59:53 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi John Clark
That's all made-up stuff put on the web by people such as you.
Not by the worldwide liberal conspiracy?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
the ancient jews in the BC era knew nothing
Not far from the truth.
of the ancient myths,
If they knew anything at all it was useless crap like that.
“There is little notice of the Persian god [Mithra] in the Roman world
Hi Craig Weinberg
Period, meaning that's it.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-23, 12:48:50
Subject: Re: Re: Sensing the presence of God
Hi Craig Weinberg
An article in the American Journal of Psychiatry in 2004 suggested that
atheists might have a higher suicide rate than theists.[10] According to
William Bainbridge, atheism is common among people whose social obligations are
weak and is also connected to lower fertility
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:32:58 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
OK, you can see that in two current junk science cults:
(a) materialism
(b) climate change
What I can see is that your responses seem to be generated by this logic
tree:
Do I Understand It?
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:46:47 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Period, meaning that's it.
I know what you meant by period. If you noticed, I attached a list of
serial killers who followed what they understood to be the voice of God.
The implication is that if you
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 4:52:59 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
An article in the American Journal of
Psychiatryhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Journal_of_Psychiatryin
2004 suggested that atheists might have a higher suicide rate than
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-22, 15:38:50
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is there an aether ?
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:22:06 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
If you knew more about the history of philsophy,
you'd know that Berkeley finally had to admit that the world out
Weinberg javascript:
*Receiver:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2013-01-22, 15:38:50
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Re: Is there an aether ?
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 7:22:06 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
If you knew more about the history of philsophy,
you'd know
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-21, 10:40:52
Subject: Re: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Monday, January 21, 2013 9:19:36 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
But nothing would exist for a blind man,
since he can see nothing.
Blind people can hear and feel and think, smell
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-21, 11:53:45
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Is there an aether ?
On Monday, January 21, 2013 4:53:25 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
That is such a silly pov.
Because it's your pov, not mine. You don't understand what I am talking about
so you keep pointing
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:49:09 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
wrote:
That doesn't have anything to do with your straw man of my position. I
have
Richard:
and what is - NOT - an illusion? are you? or me?
we have no way to ascertain existence and qualia, we just THINK.
Our science is based on SOME info we don't know exactly, not even if it is
like we think it is. We calculate in our human logic (stupidity would be
more accurate) and then
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 4:20:58 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 3:49:09 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com
Hi Craig Weinberg
That is such a silly pov. If a boulder
fell off of a cliff above you onto you that
you didn't see, would it hurt you or not ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-20, 15:47:31
Subject: Re: Re: Is there an
Hi Craig Weinberg
But nothing would exist for a blind man,
since he can see nothing.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-21, 09:11:18
Subject: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Monday, January 21, 2013 4:54:58
On Monday, January 21, 2013 9:19:36 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
But nothing would exist for a blind man,
since he can see nothing.
Blind people can hear and feel and think, smell and taste, touch.
Everything exists to the extent that it can be detected directly or
On Monday, January 21, 2013 4:53:25 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
That is such a silly pov.
Because it's your pov, not mine. You don't understand what I am talking
about so you keep pointing at a Straw Man misinterpretation of Berkeleyan
idealism.
If a boulder
fell
Hi Craig Weinberg
Then you believe that God exists.
That's a good start.
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-19, 09:55:18
Subject: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 6:22:38 AM
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:08:09 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Then you believe that God exists.
That's a good start.
Can't I point out the absurdity of a belief without being accused of having
it?
- Receiving the following content -
*From:*
-
*From:* Craig Weinberg javascript:
*Receiver:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2013-01-20, 14:18:16
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:08:09 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Then you believe that God exists
Hi Craig Weinberg
They don't make sense to you but they do make
make sense to me. Could it be that you are a low
information, low understanding person ?
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-20, 15:00:34
Subject: Re: Re: Re
:
*Receiver:* everything-list javascript:
*Time:* 2013-01-20, 15:00:34
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Re: A God-limited God - My Theodicy
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 2:43:42 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
So you belong to the liberal thought police then.
Haha of course. How could
Hi Russell Standish
Firstness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, positively and
without reference to anything else.
Secondness is the mode of being of that which is such as it is, with respect to
a second but regardless of any third.
Thirdness is the mode of being of that
I First person singular
We First person plural
You Second person singular / second person plural
He Third person masculine singular
She Third person feminine singular
It Third person neutral singular
They Third person plural / third person
Clough], [rcl...@verizon.net javascript:]
1/15/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-14, 11:51:03
Subject: Re: Re: Re: MWI as an ontological error
, 10:59:12
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: MWI as an ontological error,it should be TwoAspects
Theory
On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 6:31:51 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
1) Good point. So far, there is only indirect evidence of gravity waves.
http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=15438
], [rcl...@verizon.net javascript:]
1/17/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-17, 10:59:12
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: MWI as an ontological
: 2013-01-17, 11:59:05
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: MWI as an ontological error,it should beTwoAspects
Theory
On Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:54:03 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Sorry, I'm missing your point. What is it ?
You said Potential energy is more than conceptual, so I
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, of course. The monads are mental representations of
physical bodies in the world. You will presumably have for
your physical object some container in L He with a BEC
at the bottom. Physical objects such as rocks produce
bare naked monads. Is that what you want ?
Roger,
Your presumptions are incorrect.
Also your monad definition.
I am too old for bare naked.
Stop being silly.
Richard
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, of course. The monads are mental representations of
physical bodies in
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Fwd: the curse of materialism
Roger,
Your presumptions are incorrect.
Also your monad definition.
I am too old for bare naked.
Stop being silly.
Richard
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, of course. The monads
Hi Craig Weinberg
I agree with you. I have no idea what Richard has in mind.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/16/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-14, 11:51:03
Subject: Re: Re: Re: MWI as an ontological error, it should be TwoAspects
Theory
On Monday, January 14, 2013 7:06:57 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Why
Hi Craig Weinberg
Why not ? There are gravitational waves.
But earthquakes usually initiate waves
by the sudden release of potential energy.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
A more powwerful way to steal from the future is to continue govt spending as
it is.
But to get back to the issue, I'll let the market decide.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
-
Hi Telmo Menezes
Same here.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-14, 07:42:02
Subject: Re: Re:
Hi Richard Ruquist
OK--- in the mind.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-13, 08:45:18
Subject: Re: Re: MWI
THe problem with solar energy is that it is strongly subsidized. Instead of
you being stolen by monopolistic energy companies, you can steal the
taxpayer thank to state planning.
Most solar panels are installed because they receive subsidies by KW. As a
logical consequience a boost in production
Hi Richard Ruquist
God is not righteous by what standards ? Yours?
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/14/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time:
Hi Roger Clough,
God is everything, including this list.
Richard David,
complex variables and quantum theory go together
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
God is not righteous by what standards ? Yours?
[Roger Clough],
On Monday, January 14, 2013 7:06:57 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Why not ? There are gravitational waves.
How do you know there are gravitational waves?
But earthquakes usually initiate waves
by the sudden release of potential energy.
Potential energy is
Instead of complaining now or watching what the market does, by not really
watching it á la Roger, better include the future when considering past and
present: I bet that Spain, with its sunshine monopoly and mix of renewable
energy and infrastructure investment of the last years, will be
You are californian its'nt?
2013/1/14 Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
THe problem with solar energy is that it is strongly subsidized.
Yes, but this is lessening. Protectionism is crumbling.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
God is everything, including this list.
Then God means nothing because meaning needs contrast. If everything that
exists and everything that doesn't exist and everything you can imagine and
everything that you can't
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:49 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
God is everything, including this list.
Then God means nothing because meaning needs contrast. If everything that
exists and everything that
Hi Richard Ruquist
OK, He would work.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/12/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-11, 13:54:47
Subject: Re: Re:
-11, 14:07:13
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Subjective states can be somehow extracted
frombrainsviaacomputer
Right. Monads are below the quantum level and you have argued,
correctly I think, that not even quantum waves are physical. However,
monads may have a complex structure as you say below
Hi Richard Ruquist
For the umpteenth time, monads are not physical, they cannot be some kind of
product of EM waves.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/11/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard
Hi Richard Ruquist
The monads are not BEC's, because presumably BECs are physical.
Monads aren't
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/11/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Richard Ruquist
Receiver:
BEC condensates may contain any kind of particle, not just physicsl
particles. However, we presume that the mathematics is more or less
the same for all BECs and therefore we can come to understand BECs
with physical experiments. Presumably monads are particles, seeing
that they are discrete and
Right. Monads are below the quantum level and you have argued,
correctly I think, that not even quantum waves are physical. However,
monads may have a complex structure as you say below snipped and
string theory derives what that complex structure looks like including
the super EM flux that may be
: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 11:07:17
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
?
Better data connected to opinion than opinion alone.
?
How is opinion
], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 17:34:21
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subjective states can be somehow extracted
Hi Telmo Menezes
The electronics presumably requires a digital signal.
But the brain presumably uses analog signals.
And there is the raster line and sync signal problem.
There is the digital pixel problem, which uses only 3 colors: blue,green,red.
How can all of this work ?
[Roger
On Tuesday, January 8, 2013 5:23:55 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Presumably the brain works with analog, not digital, signals.
You are both missing the more important issue - signals cannot be decoded
in the brain. It's tempting to think that is possible because we are
Hi Craig Weinberg
Exactly.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/8/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Craig Weinberg
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-08, 09:23:56
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
Better data connected to opinion than opinion alone.
How is opinion not connected to data? Have you found a way of neatly
separating the information and data from opinion and
Hi Alberto G. Corona
I have no problem with natural selection, it is a reasonable hypothesis.
But natural selection implies some form of intelligence, which materialism
cannot explain.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/7/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -
Hi Telmo Menezes
Well then, we have at least one vote supporting the results.
I remain sceptical because of the line sync issue.
The brain doesn't provide a raster line sync signal.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/7/2013
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. - Woody
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
You're allowed to have that opinion, or any opinion.
We're different. I am a retired laboratory scientist and
a pragmatist to boot. So to me, data trumnps everything.
So I will believe
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo Menezes
Well then, we have at least one vote supporting the results.
Scientific results are not supported or refuted by votes.
I remain sceptical because of the line sync issue.
The brain
Time: 2013-01-07, 08:33:45
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Is Sheldrake credible ? I personally think so.
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Platonist Guitar Cowboy
?
You're allowed to have that opinion, or any opinion.
?
We're different. I am a retired
- Receiving the following content -
From: Telmo Menezes
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2013-01-07, 09:33:30
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Subjective states can be somehow extracted from
brainsviaacomputer
Hi Roger,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Telmo
Hi Richard Ruquist
Neither hard or soft solutions are valid
since they fantasize a meterial connection between
mind and brain. Which is absurd.
Leibniz is the only one to have solved the problem successfully.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
1/7/2013
Forever is a long time, especially
time, especially near the end. - Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
*From:* Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2013-01-07, 09:33:30
*Subject:* Re: Re: Re: Subjective states can be somehow extracted from
1 - 100 of 421 matches
Mail list logo
