On 12 Dec 2013, at 06:30, Jesse Mazer wrote:
Thanks Bruno. As I understand it step 8's movie-graph argument is
making a point similar to the implementation problem chalmers
discusses in the paper at http://consc.net/papers/rock.html --
basically the problem is that there seems to be no
Thanks Bruno. As I understand it step 8's movie-graph argument is making a
point similar to the implementation problem chalmers discusses in the
paper at http://consc.net/papers/rock.html -- basically the problem is that
there seems to be no good way to decide whether a given physical system
On 09 Dec 2013, at 23:45, meekerdb wrote:
On 12/9/2013 2:03 PM, Jesse Mazer wrote:
I don't have institutional access but I was able to read it online,
though not to download it as a PDF (I just copy-and-pasted all the
text for future reference instead). It's great to see each step of
the
On 09 Dec 2013, at 23:03, Jesse Mazer wrote:
I don't have institutional access but I was able to read it online,
That was what Elsevier (Santa) promised.
though not to download it as a PDF
Pfftt Santa looks like being a bit shabby those days ...
(I just copy-and-pasted all
Excellent, Bruno! I'm very glad for you - and for the wider audience that will now read
your ideas. However I notice Santa only delivers if you have institutional access. I do.
But others on the list may not.
Brent
On 12/9/2013 2:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi,
Santa Klaus exists, and by
I don't have institutional access but I was able to read it online, though
not to download it as a PDF (I just copy-and-pasted all the text for future
reference instead). It's great to see each step of the argument laid out in
greater detail than I've seen on the list (admittedly I don't
On 12/9/2013 2:03 PM, Jesse Mazer wrote:
I don't have institutional access but I was able to read it online, though not to
download it as a PDF (I just copy-and-pasted all the text for future reference instead).
It's great to see each step of the argument laid out in greater detail than I've
7 matches
Mail list logo
