On 19 May 2013, at 21:54, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Feel free to ask more from this post, though. If you understand the
FPI, the rest follows from logic and some passive theoretical
computer science, I think.
Yes, I
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
More to the point of my original comment, though, you frequently make
statements about how it follows from this an explanation of quantum,
qualia, matter, etc., using references to modal logic, Plotinus' theory of
On 18 May 2013, at 23:32, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Matter is a first person plural sharable border by collections of
machines which multiplied collectively on the set of all computations.
It sure would nice if you
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Feel free to ask more from this post, though. If you understand the FPI,
the rest follows from logic and some passive theoretical computer science,
I think.
Yes, I understand UDA 1-7 and the concept that first-person
On 17 May 2013, at 18:47, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/17/2013 12:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It would not be an epiphenomenon, unless you think the soul as no
power of its own. Materialist cannot keep both matter and mind.
Why not suppose they are just different aspects of the same thing.
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Matter is a first person plural sharable border by collections of machines
which multiplied collectively on the set of all computations.
It sure would nice if you could unpack this sentence, word by word, to help
make
Subject: Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough lt;rclo...@verizon.netgt;
wrote:
The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
According to the Dao de jing
...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 16, 2013 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is
matter
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough
lt;rclo...@verizon.netgt
-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is
matter
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough
lt;rclo...@verizon.netgt; wrote:
The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
According to the Dao de jing, the solution to the mind
On 5/17/2013 12:40 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
It would not be an epiphenomenon, unless you think the soul as no power of its own.
Materialist cannot keep both matter and mind.
Why not suppose they are just different aspects of the same thing.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
According to the Dao de jing, the solution to the mind-brain problem is
that it is not a problem.
On 5/16/2013 12:32 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
You mean the one George Gamow wrote for him?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop
, does the epiphenomenon, have a soul? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 16, 2013 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's
@googlegroups.**comeverything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thu, May 16, 2013 3:32 pm
Subject: Re: The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough lt;rclo...@verizon.netgt;
wrote
14 matches
Mail list logo
