Subject: Re: Re: Re: The pro-life paradox
Roger,
Your pro-life stance includes the doctor keeping you alive at all costs
whereas if you really believed in an afterlife, you are better off dead.
Richard
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
--
You received
.
Bruno
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/20/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-20, 05:12:10
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17
:44
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
On 20 Dec 2012, at 18:41, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Bruno Marchal
There is a gray area called quality of life.
OK. Nice. Should I take this as a statement that there are some cases where you
would not oppose to euthanasia?
Everything of value, all colors
On 19 Dec 2012, at 13:04, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Excuse if i don´t address your question.
I define good as that which enhances life and evil
as that which diminishes it
That is also my definition. Going a step further, good is
tautological and absolute, in the same way that
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 17 Dec 2012, at 17:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I define good as that which enhances life and evil
as that which diminishes it.
Is
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Dec 2012, at 17:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I define good
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Dec 2012, at 17:49, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I define good as that which enhances life and evil
]
12/20/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-20, 05:12:10
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote
...@verizon.net]
12/20/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-12-20, 05:12:10
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote
Roger,
Your pro-life stance includes the doctor keeping you alive at all costs
whereas if you really believed in an afterlife, you are better off dead.
Richard
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
On 12/20/2012 5:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 19 Dec 2012, at 17:01, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Is pro-life activism enhancing life or diminishing life?
Some pro-life doctor
-19, 07:04:11
Subject: Re: The pro-life paradox
Dear Bruno,
Excuse if i don? address your question.
I define good as that which enhances life and evil
as that which diminishes it
That is also my definition. Going a step further, good is tautological and
absolute, in the same way that is evil
Hi Bruno Marchal
Anything pro life saves life so is good.
Euthanasia destroys life so is bad.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/19/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody Allen
- Receiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver:
13 matches
Mail list logo
