I meant Roger. He uses this picture.
Of course I'm working on a theory that makes me a cat looking through a
goldfish bowl. (I guess I can't keep it secret any longer!)
[image: Inline images 1]
On 16 November 2013 23:37, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2013, at 21:59, LizR wrote:
>
> AHA, I
On 15 Nov 2013, at 21:59, LizR wrote:
AHA, I can see from your avatar why you're so keen on Leibniz -
you're almost his double!
:)
Are you talking to Roger or me?
Not sure which avatar you meant, nor which picture of Leibniz?
Don't mind too much ...
:)
On 16 November 2013 04:57, Br
AHA, I can see from your avatar why you're so keen on Leibniz - you're
almost his double!
:)
On 16 November 2013 04:57, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2013, at 16:30, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>
> Where's the math?
>
>
> Good question.
>
> I comment Roger below:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 a
On 15 Nov 2013, at 16:30, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Where's the math?
Good question.
I comment Roger below:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Roger Clough
wrote:
The self as lens: Leibniz's lens-like model of perception and reality.
Although I cannot find a direct reference in Leibniz's
Where's the math?
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> The self as lens: Leibniz's lens-like model of perception and reality.
>
> Although I cannot find a direct reference in Leibniz's writings, they
> have not all been translated. Nevertheless Leibniz's model
> of perception
5 matches
Mail list logo
