Re: Universal prior - Go FORTH and Run Backward

1999-11-13 Thread Marchal
David Lloyd-Jones wrote: >Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I have still a question for Russell, what is the meaning of >> giving a "physical existence" to a mathematical structure ? This is >> not at all a clear statement for me. >> > >There is a tendency for sciences to speak in the me

Re: Universal prior - Go FORTH and Run Backward

1999-11-13 Thread Marchal
Russell Standish wrote: >Thanks for the ref. Word files can be converted easily into postscript >(or some people can also convert it into PDF - same diff). However, it >would be better for you to convert the file and ship the postscript, >rather than shipping the Word file as different versions o

Re: Universal prior - Go FORTH and Run Backward

1999-11-12 Thread Russell Standish
> > Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I have still a question for Russell, what is the meaning of > > giving a "physical existence" to a mathematical structure ? This is > > not at all a clear statement for me. > > > > There is a tendency for sciences to speak in the metaphors of the a