Hi Stephen,
At 21:44 16/06/04 -0400, Stephen Paul King wrote:
BM
(previous)
Giving that the Comp, through the UDA (for exemple) , leads to
Monistic idealism, I think the use of the word epiphenomenon
could be misleading (it is used more in the non interactive dualist
approach of the mind body
At 18:23 15/06/04 -0400, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear
George,
BM:
The post is addressed to George, but concern my thesis. May I
make some comments?
I put my thesis in quotes because it is really the Sound
Universal (Turing) Machine's thesis, you
know. ... or
will know ;)
Turing is under quotes
Dear Stephen,
At 13:25 14/06/04 -0400, You (Stephen Paul King) wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Does your thesis survive without the notion of duplicatability or
copying? As I have pointed out, QM does not allow duplication and I am
hard pressed to understand how duplication can be carried out in
At 01:25 PM 6/14/2004, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
Does your thesis survive without the notion of duplicatability or
copying? As I have pointed out, QM does not allow duplication and I am
hard pressed to understand how duplication can be carried out in
classical physics.
If
Hi Stephen
Let me add my grain of salt to Bruno's post. The No Cloning Theorem
applies to the physical duplication but not necessarily to the
duplication of information that is carried by a physical substrate. For
example, you could very well make a copy of a DVD that reproduces
exactly the
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 4:25
PM
Subject: Re: duplicatability or copying
is problematic
Hi StephenLet me add my grain of salt to Bruno's post.
The No Cloning Theorem applies to the physical duplication but not necessarily
to the duplication of information that is carried by
6 matches
Mail list logo
