5 2:35
AM
Subject: Re: follow-up on Holographic
principle and MWI
I certainly have no ill intent, and am a little disappointed
that an idea can not be addressed in a proper way, that being to simply
explain the inherent problems. No need for hostility or
acrimony.That said, Jo
s
- Original Message -
From: "danny mayes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Russell Standish" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; "everything list"
everything-list@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 1:42 AM
Subject: Re: follow-up on Holographic principle and MWI
: follow-up on Holographic principle and MWI
Russell Standish wrote:
What I was asking is why you think time-area should be proportional
to length. I can't see any reasoning as to what it should be
proportional to.
Russell,
Thanks for your interest in this. I did not make this any
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:25:33AM -0400, danny mayes wrote:
Russell Standish wrote:
This is very sloppy - if time-area were proportional to volume, then
the divisor would be 10^300. Perhaps you meant proportional to length,
but then I do not see why this should be.
You are
Russell Standish wrote:
What I was asking is why you think time-area should be proportional
to length. I can't see any reasoning as to what it should be
proportional to.
Russell,
Thanks for your interest in this. I did not make this any easier by
bungling the initial concept a little in my
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:02:12PM -0400, danny mayes wrote:
Well, as described in the FOR think of the multiverse as a block, made
up of different stacks of pictures that comprise individual universes as
they move through time. Now try to adjust that to what is really going
on: space
Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:02:12PM -0400, danny mayes wrote:
Well, as described in the FOR think of the multiverse as a block, made
up of different stacks of pictures that comprise individual universes as
they move through time. Now try to adjust that to
Russell Standish wrote:
the divisor would be 10^300. Perhaps you meant proportional to length,
but then I do not see why this should be.
Don't know if I directly answered this in my first reply. If
time-area equal an equivalent spatial area, we use length as the
divisor to represent the
I'm not sure I really follow your explanation here. Are you trying to
link the information generation that occurs through MW decoherence to
the expansion of space-time through the holographic principle (the
amount of information contained within any 3D volume is proportional to
the boundary area
9 matches
Mail list logo
