Re: relevance of the real measure

2001-12-21 Thread George Levy
Wei Dai wrote: The thing is, we need a decision theory, otherwise it's not clear what predictions mean. To be cute about it, I could say that without a decision theory, a prediction is no more than a number (probability) attached to a statement, devoid of other meaning. Once you think

Re: relevance of the real measure

2001-12-21 Thread Wei Dai
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 12:12:41AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Measure is not supposed to be just an abstract number that is attached to a universe. It has meaning in terms of our own perceptions and experience in that universe. The all-universe theory includes both a model of universes

Re: relevance of the real measure

2001-12-21 Thread hal
Wei writes: Suppose there are only two logically possible deterministic universes A and B, and you know that A has measure 0.9, and B has measure 0.1. Suppose that until time T the history of these two universes are identical. At time T an experiment will be done in both universes. In

Re: relevance of the real measure

2001-12-21 Thread Wei Dai
Here's my proposed alternative to our current standard model, which says all possible universes exist and some objectively true measure exists on the set of universes. Instead, let's just say that all possible universes exist, period. There is no objective measure. Instead, measure enters into