I think that's the question Bruno's proof is designed to answer in the
negative, a conclusion of which I have difficulty convincing myself.m.a.
- Original Message -
From: John Mikes
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:16 AM
Sorry, I misunderstood the premise. Thanks for the quick reply. marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 2:16 AM
Subject: Re: request for glossary + announcement that the seventh step series
Marty,
how about my weird question: and if 1 is wrong and what he 'sees' as OA is
only a replica of the OA and is WRONG? Is 'being a replica' a human
priviledge?
(Forget it!)
John M
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:04 PM, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Bruno,
Good to see you back! I
On 07 Nov 2009, at 01:04, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
Good to see you back! I have a question with reference
to the experiment described in the first person indeterminacy paper.
If, before the teleportation, the omniscient authority tells the
subject that he will find a zero in
4 matches
Mail list logo
