Michiel de Jong wrote: > George Levy writes: > > There is no "previous" in the sense of previous time, only in > > terms of logical antecedent. > > Did you write any papers on this, that I can download and read? > I would be very much interested in reading some of your work on this. Glad you asked. I wrote a whole book on this subject but couldn't find a publisher (I was probably too far out and my name is not Descartes :-). I'll eventually put it on the web when I have enough spare time from my regular work. This list provides archives you can consult, in which I explain my ideas. George PS. You have a nice home page.
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures George Levy
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures James Higgo
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures George Levy
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures George Levy
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures George Levy
- Re: on formally describable universes and measures Stephen Paul King
- Re: on formally describable universes and measu... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable universes and m... Stephen Paul King
- Re: on formally describable universes a... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable univer... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable univer... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable un... Stephen Paul King
- Re: on formally describable un... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable un... Russell Standish
- Re: on formally describable un... Brent Meeker
- Re: on formally describable un... Russell Standish
- Re: on formally describable un... Saibal Mitra
- Re: on formally describable un... Russell Standish
- Re: on formally describable un... George Levy
- Re: on formally describable un... Russell Standish