Re: Scott Aronson on free will

2012-11-05 Thread Craig Weinberg
On Wednesday, October 31, 2012 12:25:12 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 , meekerdb meek...@verizon.net javascript: wrote: John Clark should get a kick out of this: http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/ In computer science, we deal all the time with processes that are

Re: Scott Aronson on free will

2012-10-31 Thread John Clark
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 , meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: John Clark should get a kick out of this: http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/ In computer science, we deal all the time with processes that are neither deterministic nor random. BULLSHIT! An example is a nondeterministic

Re: Scott Aronson on free will

2012-10-31 Thread Russell Standish
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:25:06PM -0400, John Clark wrote: On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 , meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: John Clark should get a kick out of this: http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/ In computer science, we deal all the time with processes that are neither

Scott Aronson on free will

2012-10-30 Thread meekerdb
John Clark should get a kick out of this: http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/ A Scientifically-Supportable Notion of Free Will In Only 6 Controversial Steps: The Looniest Talk I've Ever Given In My Life http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/freewill.ppt: Setting Time Aright (FQXi Conference),

Re: Scott Aronson on free will

2012-10-30 Thread Stephen P. King
On 10/30/2012 2:46 AM, meekerdb wrote: John Clark should get a kick out of this: http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/ A Scientifically-Supportable Notion of Free Will In Only 6 Controversial Steps: The Looniest Talk I've Ever Given In My Life http://www.scottaaronson.com/talks/freewill.ppt: