Re: Serious *Mistake* by Schmidthuber

2002-09-08 Thread Russell Standish
Interesting post. Unfortunately, I don't have enough time at present to properly digest it or understand it. I gather that your "rare events" are the ones of measure zero. In the Schmidhuber ensemble, these events are never observed, and consequently are ignored. Only finite length descriptions (

Re: Serious *Mistake* by Schmidthuber

2002-09-06 Thread Osher Doctorow
IL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:19 PM Subject: Re: Serious *Mistake* by Schmidthuber > At 12:20 PM -0700 on 9/6/02, Osher Doctorow wrote: > > >Thus, not only can > >conditional probability not model events of probability 0, but it

Re: Serious *Mistake* by Schmidthuber

2002-09-06 Thread Bill Jefferys
At 12:20 PM -0700 on 9/6/02, Osher Doctorow wrote: >Thus, not only can >conditional probability not model events of probability 0, but it cannot >even model events of probability close to 0 (Rare Events). Nonsense. It's done all the time for events of low probability. Bill

Serious *Mistake* by Schmidthuber

2002-09-06 Thread Osher Doctorow
From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Fri. Sept. 6, 2002 11:45AM I have read about half of J. Schmidthuber's *A computer scientist's view of life, the universe, and everything,* (1997), and he has interesting ideas and clarity of presentation, but I have to disagree with him on a number of plac