Re: The Origin of Physical Laws and Sensations - Bruno Marchal, Université de Bruxelles

> On 9 Apr 2018, at 22:10, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 4/9/2018 7:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:42, agrayson2...@gmail.com >>> wrote: >>> >>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.pdf

Re: The Origin of Physical Laws and Sensations - Bruno Marchal, Université de Bruxelles

On 4/9/2018 7:10 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:42, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.pdf On 3,) Arithmetic

Re: The Origin of Physical Laws and Sensations - Bruno Marchal, Université de Bruxelles

> On 8 Apr 2018, at 19:42, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.pdf > > On 3,) Arithmetic Realism (AR), why is the statement "1+1=2", equivalent to > the Goldbach conjecture, or the inexistence of a bigger prime, or the > statement

The Origin of Physical Laws and Sensations - Bruno Marchal, Université de Bruxelles

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/publications/SANE2004MARCHAL.pdf On 3,) Arithmetic Realism (AR), why is the statement "1+1=2", equivalent to the Goldbach conjecture, or the inexistence of a bigger prime, or the statement that some digital machine will stop? Please take each item in list