Dear Bruno: After looking at all of your recent posts re my questions I conclude that my Superverse idea and your UDA idea are cousins. See also my just previous post re "Some progress I think".
Differences: My argument carries a rationale for a lowest level repeating scanner-duplicator type of behavior [i.e. stability], my Superverse is generated immediately and repeatedly at one end of that behavior, the Superverse acts as "data food" for all my parallel computers which are actually comparators orchestrating isomorphic link shifts between all the patterns in the Superverse [link shifts = evolving universes], and it takes no selected information to construct all these computers since they are self contained in each link but such information though small seems necessary to construct the UD. Hal
