Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-24 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Dec 2009, at 18:08, John Mikes wrote: Reality versions(?) continued... In his post Benjamin Jakubik wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: Honestly I think you are a bit dishonest to yourself here, since you already presume the appearance of

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 20 Dec 2009, at 05:55, Stephen Paul King wrote: Dear Ronald, The theory is pure unadulterated Idealism. Matter/energy are, at best, considered as epiphenomena. My efferts to discuss alternatives have lead nowhere... You may try again, or refer to links to your theories. The UD

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-19 Thread m.a.
As a tyro, I'm wondering whether this is just a summary of what physicists already know or a genuine conceptual breakthrough.marty a. On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com wrote: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3433.pdf any comments on

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-19 Thread ronaldheld
Not to hijack my thread, but even if Physics is just a subbranch of PA, I have difficulty conceiving of numerical computations happening without matter/energy. Ronald On Dec 19, 12:08 pm, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote: *Reality **versions(?)* continued...

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
@googlegroups.com Sent: Saturday, December 19, 2009 7:04 PM Subject: Re: paper on view of reality Not to hijack my thread, but even if Physics is just a subbranch of PA, I have difficulty conceiving of numerical computations happening without matter/energy. Ronald On Dec 19, 12:08 pm, John Mikes

paper on view of reality

2009-12-18 Thread ronaldheld
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3433.pdf any comments on this? Ronald -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to everything-l...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-18 Thread John Mikes
Ronald: WHAT is reality? 'physical' is one degree weaker, it is most likely based on observations we call 'physical' in the figment: physical world(view) - the poorly understood/explainable - as the article puts it: 'ontological in science' - explanatory figment. John M On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at

Re: paper on view of reality

2009-12-18 Thread Mike Dougherty
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com wrote: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3433.pdf any comments on this? My first thought was, Am I going to be able to follow 19 pages of this? The answer was: not in complete detail. My next thought was how