Re: [Evolution-hackers] Importers and docs

2004-02-10 Thread JP Rosevear
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 17:57, Aaron Weber wrote: Ok, you're probably tired of hearing about importers by now, but I have a question: The Evolution manual says you can import ics, vcf/gcrd, mbx, and ldif files. The single-file importer, however, only asks about 2 file types: icv and vcf.

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Importers and docs

2004-02-10 Thread JP Rosevear
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:46, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:23, JP Rosevear wrote: On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 17:57, Aaron Weber wrote: Ok, you're probably tired of hearing about importers by now, but I have a question: The Evolution manual says you can import ics,

[Evolution-hackers] Task and Calendar list columns

2004-02-10 Thread JP Rosevear
Looking at the list columns for tasks we probably have too many available, for instance how likely is the person to use geographic positon (especially when we have no UI for it). I like Han's notion in the event list to cut down the number of columns available. So i propose we limit the columns

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Revised Schedule Proposal

2004-02-10 Thread Not Zed
Just remember, adding even a single feature means more maintenance. We already have enough to keep us busy for months, if all we were doing was making the current feature-set perfect. On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 17:00 +0100, guenther wrote: Here is the proposed revised schedule for Evolution 2.0,

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution 1.4.5 and Outlook vCalendar messages

2004-02-10 Thread Nicolas MONNET
Le Mon 09/02/2004 14:03, Not Zed a crit : its probably some race in the setup of the window. probably the best you can do with 1.4.x is try to move to another message then move back? I get the same here. Changing message doesn't make a difference. This seems to happen with Outlook 11.0,

[Evolution-hackers] Updating Docs

2004-02-10 Thread Brian P. Skahan
Hey all, I saw the post on the codeblog about needing doc proofreading. If there's still a need for this let me know. -Brian -- Brian P. Skahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Etria, LLP 410-837-3992 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cyrus IMAP

2004-02-10 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lun 09/02/2004 à 19:07, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit : this shouldn't have any effect on connection hangs. Also, 4k seems pretty reasonable to me for uid set lengths... 256 is a bit small. Especially since uw.imapd, being known for being intolerant of long lines, easily handles 8k. I'd be

Re: [Evolution] address autocomplete broken in my 1.4.5 build

2004-02-10 Thread Paul Hands
No - autocompletion only kicks in after 3 characters, so typing bo won't do anything. P. On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 04:42, k rennert wrote: Hey all, I just compiled a fresh copy of evolution 1.4.5 on a clean gentoo install. Everything works great, except for the address autocomplete feature

Re: [Evolution] Re: mutt bounce feature

2004-02-10 Thread guenther
Redirect as It's also a more accurate label, imho. FWIW, I agree. What I'd really like to advocate is you consider moving it to a more exposed position - even so far as to be parallel to Reply and Forward in the Actions menu and right-click context menu. I'm not sure if this would be

[Evolution] Inline PGP

2004-02-10 Thread Hubert Adgié
Hi, I mean that it should be in the FAQ but didn't find it. Is it possible to have Evolution vérifying or decryting inline PGP ? I look for build-in function or external workaround. thanks in advance. -- Hubert Adgié ISP Informatique www.ispinfo.fr

Re: [Evolution] Inline PGP

2004-02-10 Thread guenther
Is it possible to have Evolution vérifying or decryting inline PGP ? Nope, this is currently not supported. However, there is a bounty for this feature and it likely will be implemented in 2.2. Unfortunately this feature probably will not be included in 2.2 already, as the code was finished

Re: [Evolution] Inline PGP

2004-02-10 Thread guenther
Is it possible to have Evolution vérifying or decryting inline PGP ? Nope, this is currently not supported. However, there is a bounty for this feature and it likely will be implemented in 2.2. Unfortunately this feature probably will not be included in 2.2 already, as the code was

[Evolution] Focus policy - sending urls to firefox

2004-02-10 Thread Brad Warkentin
I realize this is likely a Gnome issue and appologise in advance for that. I am hoping someone has already dealt with it inside of Evolution. I am running Evolution 1.4.3 with KDE 3.2 and Firefox (Firebird 0.8 :-). I have no problem getting firefox to display web pages from Evolution, but I can't

Re: [Evolution] Focus policy - sending urls to firefox

2004-02-10 Thread Brad Warkentin
guenther wrote: However, it seems Mozilla does not recognize the -noraise option. I haven't found a way yet to control this behavior. The Mozilla window gets to the front, but does not have the focus. Hummm... firefox happily accepts the -noraise option. However it must be in front of the

[Evolution] Hotsyncing Palm Pilot on 1.5.3

2004-02-10 Thread Peter N. Spotts
Folks, Sorry if this isn't the right place for the question, but I've been working with 1.5.3 over the past couple of days and have had trouble hot syncing my Palm Pilot. The connections are made, and the Pilot displays the syncing messages, but nothing ends up in the calendar, todo list, or

Fwd: Re: [Evolution] address autocomplete broken in my 1.4.5 build

2004-02-10 Thread k rennert
Thanks for the ideas Matt, here's what I've tried (evolution 1.4.5): 1 - address autocomplete works if I create a new 'test' user and start evolution from scratch. 2 - if I move my own ~/evolution directory to ~/oldevolution, or ~/crap , and then start up evolution, a few things aren't

Re: Fwd: Re: [Evolution] address autocomplete broken in my 1.4.5 build

2004-02-10 Thread guenther
1 - address autocomplete works if I create a new 'test' user and start evolution from scratch. 2 - if I move my own ~/evolution directory to ~/oldevolution, or ~/crap , and then start up evolution, a few things aren't found (like my shortcuts.xml), but most things, including my

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: [Evolution] address autocomplete broken in my 1.4.5 build

2004-02-10 Thread k rennert
Excellent! Doing the --force-shutdown didn't help matters (though it did allow me to start with a clean addressbook, autocomplete was still broken. I checked my autocomplete settings (I hadn't realized that was a setting at all), and found that my contacts were already set up to be

Re: Fwd: Re: [Evolution] address autocomplete broken in my 1.4.5 build

2004-02-10 Thread Ralph Sanford
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:51, guenther wrote: 1 - address autocomplete works if I create a new 'test' user and start evolution from scratch. 2 - if I move my own ~/evolution directory to ~/oldevolution, or ~/crap , and then start up evolution, a few things aren't found (like my

Re: [Evolution] Clicking on https: links doesn't work

2004-02-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 17:09, guenther wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 16:09, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 00:26, guenther wrote: Especially check the GConf keys in /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/http and /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/https. The GUI only sets the former.

Re: [Evolution] Clicking on https: links doesn't work

2004-02-10 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2004-02-09 at 16:29, Aaron Weber wrote: I had a similar problem at one point: https:// links opened in Mozilla and http:// links in Galeon. It turned out that GNOME was treating https as unknown in the Internet services-- Open the control center, open the file-associations tool,

Re: [Evolution] Clicking on https: links doesn't work

2004-02-10 Thread Aaron Weber
Browser selection problems are the #1 help request from Evolution users, and they're often not simply I want a different browser. This issue points to some of the larger integration problems that we're beginning to address now in our desktop development work. Thanks for your persistence! a. On

[Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cyrus IMAP

2004-02-10 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le lun 09/02/2004 à 19:07, Jeffrey Stedfast a écrit : this shouldn't have any effect on connection hangs. Also, 4k seems pretty reasonable to me for uid set lengths... 256 is a bit small. Especially since uw.imapd, being known for being intolerant of long lines, easily handles 8k. I'd be

[Evolution] Re: [Evolution-hackers] Cyrus IMAP

2004-02-10 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:34, Not Zed wrote: Also, 4k seems pretty reasonable to me for uid set lengths... 256 is a bit small. Especially since uw.imapd, being known for being intolerant of long lines, easily handles 8k. I agree, is 256 really required, its kind of low? Have you tried