[Evolution-hackers] test

2004-04-25 Thread Trent Lloyd
please ignore, i haven't got any evo-{hackers,patches} mails in 2-3 days :) Cheers, Trent -- Trent Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bur.st Networking Inc. ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2004-04-25 Thread Joaquim Fellmann
On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 21:57 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote: Are you updating the cn of the entry? There's been some talk of that failing (and it does for me too, without some recent changes in my source tree) with openldap 2.1+. Will the next 1.5 release integrate those changes ? -- Joaquim

Re: [Evolution] ldif import filter

2004-04-25 Thread Masaf Acker
Chris Toshok wrote: <>what's the attribute thunderbird is using in the .ldif file? The current importer uses "cellphone", which is what the old mozilla code used to use. I don't have thunderbird installed here to check. Hi, I replaced "mobile" to "cellphone" in the thunderbird ldif file and

Re: [Evolution] ldif import filter

2004-04-25 Thread Chris Toshok
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 11:50 +0200, Masaf Acker wrote: Chris Toshok wrote: what's the attribute thunderbird is using in the .ldif file? The current importer uses cellphone, which is what the old mozilla code used to use. I don't have thunderbird installed here to check. Hi, I replaced

Re: [Evolution] ldif import filter

2004-04-25 Thread Masaf Acker
Chris Toshok wrote: I've added support for "mobile" in the importer, so it'll use "mobile" as well as "cellphone". That's great. can you shortly explain, how I can install the patch (where I can download it) ? big thanks

Re: [Evolution] ldif import filter

2004-04-25 Thread Chris Toshok
update from CVS, or wait for the next snapshot. Chris On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 19:50 +0200, Masaf Acker wrote: Chris Toshok wrote: I've added support for mobile in the importer, so it'll use mobile as well as cellphone. That's great. can you shortly explain, how I can install the patch

Re: [Evolution] LDAP

2004-04-25 Thread Chris Toshok
Dunno if it'll make the next snapshot. My solution turns out to have problems of its own. It's not an easy problem to fix. Chris On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 11:26 +0200, Joaquim Fellmann wrote: On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 21:57 -0700, Chris Toshok wrote: Are you updating the cn of the entry? There's

[Evolution] evolution address book as data source in OOo

2004-04-25 Thread Psztor Ferenc
Dear list, It is great that OOo has a connection to evolution address book. But the character handling is strange. Every special East-European character is replaced by an 8-character string starting with \. (Maybe it is the result of an UNICODE conversion ?) Is there any way for proper viewing

Re: [Evolution] Will Evolution 2.0 support RSS feeds

2004-04-25 Thread Dave
On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 10:58, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 13:04 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 11:21 +0200, Dipl.-Ing. Gregor Hlawacek wrote: Am Sa, den 24.04.2004 schrieb Rodrigo Moya um 12:19: On Sat, 2004-04-24 at 05:07 +0200, Martin Skjöldebrand wrote:

[Evolution] On beta testing

2004-04-25 Thread D. D. Brierton
So, I've been feeling guilty about not contributing more to the Evolution development cycle -- which in my case means testing for and reporting bugs. But I realised something just now and wanted to let the developers know if they're reading: I won't beta test Evolution because it is simply too

Re: [Evolution] Will Evolution 2.0 support RSS feeds

2004-04-25 Thread guenther
Hm, I sent this earlier, but I don't think it made it to the list for some reason. So I'm resending. If you've seen this already, ignore it. ;) Thats fine, but I still don't understand why its going away. I know I already explained this on the list (like others, too) but I cannot find my

Re: [Evolution] Will Evolution 2.0 support RSS feeds

2004-04-25 Thread Andrew Cowie
On Mon, 2004-04-26 at 11:17, guenther wrote: [ ... no more Summary page ... ] There are better RSS aggregators out there. I agree - that's the reason that really counts IMHO. There's no reason for it be in Evo. It's not like they are taking away a feature that doesn't exist anywhere else. I

Re: [Evolution] On beta testing

2004-04-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
No worries mate, and thanks very much for the pat on the back - it's always good to hear you're appreciated ;-) Jeff On Sun, 2004-04-25 at 20:18, D. D. Brierton wrote: So, I've been feeling guilty about not contributing more to the Evolution development cycle -- which in my case means testing