Re: [Evolution] Annoying little problem in Evo 2.0.1

2005-08-26 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
you might try upgrading to evolution 2.2.3 Jeff On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 21:17 -0400, Kelly J. Morris wrote: I've encountered an annoying little problem in Evo 2.0.1 (in SuSE Pro 9.2). Whenever I right-click on a message in my InBox and then click on Move to Folder, the folder list that appears

Re: [Evolution-hackers] IMAP4REV1

2005-08-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Not Zed wrote: Remove it from the build entirely, and then add new migration code to switch it to the older 'imap' implementation, or some other equivalent switch over mechanism. The folder paths, foldernames, cache, summary files, are all probably so different as to make this a lot of work.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution has no mail providers

2005-08-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
looks like the plugins have been deleted or something (mail providers are also plugins) did you uninstall parts of it or something? Jeff Matthew McMinn wrote: Somehow in the last few days, my evolution installation has gotten really screwed up. I logged in today to find all of my mail

Re: [Evolution] Future emails

2005-08-24 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
that setting is calendar-only. the mailer uses the system time and the system timezone Jeremey Wise wrote: Hmm. Maybe the issue is that the time zone is set to New_York but no mention of Daylight savings time etc. On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:52 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Umm, i showed direct

Re: [Evolution] Stupid MUA Behavior (Trash)

2005-08-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 07:45 -0600, Jeffrey D. Means wrote: Why is it that when using Evolution as a MUA with IMAP when I delete a piece of mail I have to take a 4 step process to actually delete the trash: 1: Pressing delete places it in the Evolution Trash folder for the IMAP account

Re: [Evolution] Stupid MUA Behavior (Trash)

2005-08-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Jeffrey D. Means wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 10:09 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 07:45 -0600, Jeffrey D. Means wrote: Why is it that when using Evolution as a MUA with IMAP when I delete a piece of mail I have to take a 4 step process

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.4 error message

2005-08-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
that's the error from the server, so presumably it is detecting that you are sending that virus. Are you attaching files? Perhaps one of them contains the virus? Jeff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All of my outgoing email appears to be blocked. Whenever I try to send, I get the error message

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.4.5

2005-08-18 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 09:43 +0200, Sachteleben, Mario wrote: Dear all, I have installed evolution 1.4.5 from Scientific Linux 3 was this Scientific Linux 3 distro in the field of archeology by any chance? :) Archeologists have been trying to find evidence that Evolution 1.4.5 even existed...

Re: [Evolution] IMAP speed

2005-08-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
the imap code was recently changed to delay scanning the folder for changes rather than doing it right at open time which makes it appear faster. Jeff On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 00:13 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: Just so you guys don't think I do nothing but complain, let me say that I

Re: [Evolution] toolbar display text

2005-08-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 18:33 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 18:20 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:42 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Evolution never had its own setting for the toolbar, nor should it, it is a desktop-wide feel thing, having every

Re: [Evolution] toolbar display text

2005-08-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 11:54 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 09:38 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: The fact that they don't means there is an assumption that Gnome is the desktop and the user will just click on the Gnome Control Panel. And what if the user

Re: [Evolution] toolbar display text

2005-08-15 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 18:20 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:42 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Evolution never had its own setting for the toolbar, nor should it, it is a desktop-wide feel thing, having every application use its own setting is just stupid and annoying.

Re: [Evolution] Save all attachments problem

2005-08-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
yea, I actively fought this patch going in but was overruled by some unknown entity (patch was ninja-committed just before UI freeze) all you can do now is file bugs (I actually filed one about it taking up a lot of space) and hope that they get resolved in time for 2.4 everything about the new

Re: [Evolution] Using port 993

2005-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
this isn't neded because 993 is the standard high port for SSL connections to IMAP On Sun, 2005-07-31 at 14:42 +0300, Kimmo Elo wrote: Hi, on 2005-07-30 at 01:59 -0700, David Wright wrote: I am trying to confiugre evolution 2.2.3 on debian to connect with my IMAP server. My server expects

Re: [Evolution] Using port 993

2005-07-30 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 01:59 -0700, David Wright wrote: I am trying to confiugre evolution 2.2.3 on debian to connect with my IMAP server. My server expects SSL-encrypted connections of port 993 (imaps). But evolution keeps trying to contact my server on port 143 (imap2), even though I have

Re: [Evolution] Calendar items and tasks INVISIBLE after gpilot crash

2005-07-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
in the list before posting a bug report, but let me know if I should go straight there. Thanks. ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution build error (looking for libsoup in the wrong place)

2005-07-28 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/colding/work/src/GNOME_CVS/evolution' make: *** [all] Error 2 # end ### -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

Re: [Evolution-hackers] e-d-s build problem

2005-07-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
this problem. Shouldn't ${includedir} be added to INCLUDES by the configure script? -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Compose should follow Dialog HIG (re location of Send button)

2005-07-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 16:41 +1000, Nigel Tao wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-23 at 13:58 -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: The Compose windows is NOT a dialog. Conceptually or in practice. It has menus. It has toolbars. It has Minimize/Maximize icons. It is a window. I don't know what the sound juicer UI

Re: [Evolution] Stripping HTML

2005-07-22 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
? (Evolution 2.0.2 on RHELWS4) not sure if this is new feature in 2.2.x versions Edit-pref-Mail Pref-HTML Mail-Plaint Text Mode Thanks, Phil. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

Re: [Evolution] Crash on start with X Error: BadAccess

2005-07-19 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
are you using a gtk theme that makes gtk widgets look/act like Qt/kde widgets? That's what it looks like from the errors printed to the console. I would suggest disabling gtk themes and seeing if that resolves the issue. I know at one point, a lot of KDE users submitted bugs about Evolution

Re: [Evolution] Missing very useful feature

2005-07-16 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
someone could write a plugin to do that. I don't think any such feature would ever become a core component of evolution tho. Jeff On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 16:35 +0200, May DouĊĦak wrote: Well everyone has it's own preference and that's the power of Linux- in Winblowz you can't choose anything,

Re: [Evolution] Import GPG keys from within Evolution

2005-07-13 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
way of achieving this? Thanks and regards, ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

RE: [Evolution] Meeting invitations invalid

2005-07-08 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
the plugin that provides that feature was not ever meant to be shipped, it was only ever meant as an example of how to write a plugin. Just disable it and all will be good. Jeff On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 12:05 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: Check you settings - specifically Mail Preferences -

Re: Fwd: [Evolution-hackers] Found key binding bug, need hint!

2005-07-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Mozilla doesn't use Gtk, it emulates gtk look On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 00:55 +0200, Roland Orre wrote: sorry, used the wrong reply button. I think this is of interest for the list as well. -- Forwarded message -- From: Roland Orre [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Jul 7, 2005 12:43 AM

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: Tunning for large number of files in INBOX]

2005-07-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:37 +0800, Not Zed wrote: A huge slowness for Evo IMAP is the fact that it has to ask for whole-headers in order to support vfoldering on mailing-lists, attachment icons in the message-list, etc. This is only 'much faster' if the server caches this info - some do

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: Tunning for large number of files in INBOX]

2005-07-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 09:33 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 10:09 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 11:37 +0800, Not Zed wrote: A huge slowness for Evo IMAP is the fact that it has to ask for whole-headers in order to support vfoldering on mailing

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: Tunning for large number of files in INBOX]

2005-07-05 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com

Re: [Evolution] [Fwd: Re: Tunning for large number of files in INBOX]

2005-07-05 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
oh yea, and threading... because ENVELOPE only gets you the In-Reply-To value, not the References values. Jeff On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 13:16 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 10:41 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: I can't comment on Pine, but I find TBird's IMAP a lot faster

Re: [Evolution] Moving Data from 2.0.4 to 2.2.2

2005-07-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
would have been simpler if you had stated more clearly what you intended to do in your original mail... because moving data between machines requires a whole other set of requirements than just upgrading evolution you need to shutdown gconfd on both the source and destination machines before you

Re: [Evolution] Moving Data from 2.0.4 to 2.2.2

2005-07-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
don't ask me, ask the gconf guys. we didn't write it, we only use it because we didn't want to have to maintain our own config db library too. Jeff On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 14:20 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2005-07-02 at 10:07 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: 1. the reason you need to shut

Re: [Evolution] IMAP questions

2005-07-01 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I was considering proposing to remove it as well. Jeff On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:25 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote: Which imap implementation are you using? imap4rev1 is newer but less

Re: [Evolution] Moving Data from 2.0.4 to 2.2.2

2005-07-01 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
for your help. Trish ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

Re: [Evolution] IMAP questions

2005-06-30 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
I'm not sure what provider type you've been using (the Server Type menu in the account editor), but you probably want to be using IMAP and not IMAP4rev1. That may solve your crash problems... The IMAP4rev1 plugin is what I was working on before I left the team to try and write a cleaner

Re: [Evolution] IMAP questions

2005-06-30 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 15:42 +0200, Thomas Emmel wrote: Hi Jeffrey, I switched to IMAP as you suggested but I had initially switched to IMAP4rev1 since there is a folder that I like to see but therefore I have to change the namespace. If I do that I can see that folder but evolution says

Re: [Evolution] evolution filter export/converter to SIEVE

2005-06-28 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
unfortunately this functionality does not exist yet. Jeff On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 14:44 +0200, Johannes Behr wrote: Hi, SIEVE is a mail filter language used e.g. in imap-server to filter message directly on the server. Our server supports SIEVE filter and I would like to immigrate my

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch proposal to e-msg-composer and -attachment-bar

2005-06-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
2005-06-26 klockan 10:04 -0400 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: please use diff -up next time On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 16:40 +0200, smurfd wrote: Hey! Using the cvs diff function, was indeed easy. Im hoping the sewage has atleast turned into a small fork or something ;) I choosed

Re: [Evolution] Inline attachment display

2005-06-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution email message attachment On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 11:55 -0400, Ron Johnson wrote: -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution

Re: [Evolution] Inline attachment display

2005-06-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
well, the ATT*.TXT attachment stuff is pretty typical Exchange behaviour. Jeff On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 19:03 -0400, Graham Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 10:14 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: looks like your mail server is beaking stuff. Jeff Can you tell me more? Give me

Re: Scaling Evo for large mailsets (was Re: [OT] Re: [Evolution] strategies for handling lots of mail)

2005-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 04:23 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 14:51 +0800, Not Zed wrote: There is no exact solution that'll fit to everyone. Let me tell you what I'm doing. I have more than 2000 folders and sub/subfolders and it takes ~5 min to start Evo on a relevantly

Re: Scaling Evo for large mailsets (was Re: [OT] Re: [Evolution] strategies for handling lots of mail)

2005-06-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 13:54 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 07:14 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 04:23 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 14:51 +0800, Not Zed wrote: There is no exact solution that'll fit to everyone. Let me tell you

Re: [Evolution] Filter

2005-06-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
there was a bug report that if | Size | is greater than | 0 leads to the same error message, perhaps it is related. cheers, andre ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey

Re: [Evolution] Filter

2005-06-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
-expression syntax -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] vfolders slow to update unread message count

2005-06-10 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 13:33 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:04 +0800, Not Zed wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 09:29 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 17:22 +0800, Not Zed wrote: try putting 'scan all folders for new mail' in the imap folder options.

Re: Gnome-Bounties - Conversations - Was [Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] proper threading headers]

2005-06-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 23:25 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:35 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:46 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: /me wondering only. /me also wishes to know if Evo will only day support or divert somewhat from the RFC

Re: Gnome-Bounties - Conversations - Was [Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] proper threading headers]

2005-06-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
to support Thread-Index altho that doesn't mean it won't happen. I have no idea. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman

Re: Gnome-Bounties - Conversations - Was [Re: [Evolution-hackers] Re: [Evolution] proper threading headers]

2005-06-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 23:25 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:35 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:46 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: /me wondering only. /me also wishes to know if Evo will only day support or divert somewhat from the RFC

RE: [Evolution] why is reply-to not to the list?

2005-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
for 2.0 or 1.4 series of evolution. 2.2 has this feature removed. since when? it is in 2.2 and 2.3 -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:10 +0800, Ow Mun Heng wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 23:54 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Fejj, On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 01:16 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:02 -0600

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
hierarchy also and have a intuitive Icon view for attachments. Just thinking. -Srini. Srinivasa Ragavan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/05 9:53 PM fejj, Good, pro'lly ill put my thinking with it and try posting more data with it. Thanks for your worthy comments :-) -Srini. Jeffrey Stedfast

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Yes, I think the tree-view icon list definitely solves some of the problems I was worried about for the flat icon-list. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
-- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
for there to be a sw-flash animation between the 2 text parts even tho Evolution is currently unable to actually render the sw-flash animation. This type of thing is very important to me. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

Re: [Evolution] Proposal: Evolution Attachment UI

2005-06-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 14:21 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: Fejj, My replies are below. dobey: probably you can add in your thoughts, and point out things to the rit direction. On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 01:16 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 12:02 -0600, Srinivasa

Re: [Evolution] Threaded Message List View

2005-05-25 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
References: and In-Reply-To: which are defined in the specs. Thread-* are Microsoft's proprietary headers. Jeff On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 14:40 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 11:51 +1200, Russell Fulton wrote: On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 10:37 -0400, Ira Siwatu wrote: What effect

Re: [Evolution] SuSE 9.3 Evolution 2.2.1

2005-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 09:37 -0400, Jeremey Wise wrote: I have updated my laptop to SuSE Pro 9.3 and am finding many querks which I would like to see if it is a process issue / change or a bug. Here are my evolution related issues. 1) File associations in my SuSE 9.2 (which I believe was evo

Re: [Evolution] SuSE 9.3 Evolution 2.2.1

2005-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 12:06 -0400, Jeremey Wise wrote: On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 10:51 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 09:37 -0400, Jeremey Wise wrote: I have updated my laptop to SuSE Pro 9.3 and am finding many querks which I would like to see if it is a process issue

Re: [Evolution] Multiple pop accounts

2005-05-24 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
. Thanks. On 5/24/05, Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: he could use filetrs, that is, afterall, what they are for. Jeff On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:19 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 15:56 +1200, Russell Fulton wrote: On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:32 +0200

[Evolution] weird ui in evo 2.3

2005-05-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
It seems that there no longer exists an Edit-Select All allowing me to select the entire list of messages in the message-list. In the composer, why is the attachment area always open? that's a pretty huge waste of space if I'm not attaching anything... -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker

Re: [Evolution] Multiple pop accounts

2005-05-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
he could use filetrs, that is, afterall, what they are for. Jeff On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:19 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 15:56 +1200, Russell Fulton wrote: On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:32 +0200, Opera wrote: Hello the list, after searching on google and in the

Re: [Evolution] weird ui in evo 2.3

2005-05-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
then you aren't using 2.3.2 cvs On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 12:28 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:12 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: It seems that there no longer exists an Edit-Select All allowing me to select the entire list of messages in the message-list

Re: [Evolution] Environment variables? / How to specify evolution directory?

2005-05-15 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
you can't. evolution uses gconf which stores all settings in its own prefix and is a system-wide daemon, so no environment variables will help there. Jeff On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 15:18 -0400, Booth, David (W3C Fellow - Boston) wrote: How can I tell evolution what directory to use, instead of the

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties

2005-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
how ablout the Completed text on the bounty item? :) Jeff On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:37 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 12:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: eh? it's already been solved. Wow, it's a good thing I quit before wasting any more time on it then. How was I

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties

2005-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
-0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: how ablout the Completed text on the bounty item? :) That one is not completed. Jeff, you're looking at the wrong bounty. Nat ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties

2005-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
-13 at 12:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: eh? it's already been solved. Just to be clear, I am referring to the new message templates. I don't think that's been completed. For some reason the URL you posted opens the page in firefox pointing to the previous item (Attachment bar

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties

2005-05-13 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
undocumented. Lee -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution] Evo Stopped Working Under KDE

2005-05-12 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
- evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Patch Review process

2005-05-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
, any ? -Harish -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers

Re: [Evolution] writing email using openoffice

2005-05-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
? no and not to my knowledge. greets, Erik Romijn ___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Win32 portability issues

2005-05-04 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 18:31 +0530, Not Zed wrote: On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 12:51 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Not Zed writes: Yeah there's a good reason it is done. You could check the hackers archives perhaps for more discussion. In short, because db's format changes with different

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Keyboard navigation broken

2005-05-04 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http

Re: [Evolution] REPOST: Bug in TLS for POP3 and IMAP

2005-05-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
when Evolution does when-possible mode, it sets TLS1 as the preferred encryption type on the libnss socket, so I have no idea why it would be using something else. you can check the code yourself at: evolution-data-server/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-store.c:connect_to_server() and

Re: [Evolution] Deleted mail not making it to trash

2005-05-03 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
deleting it. I'm using 2.0.2 (included with Fedora Core 3). In this case, I'm using IMAP. I tried deleting stuff in an Evo Exchange account, and that worked fine. I like IAMP because it's FAST. Did I miss a bug report? -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution] Re: Re: Re: New evolution user questions

2005-05-02 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
create an account of type Local Deliver and point it at /var/mail/user, hit SendReceive and mail will be downloaded into On This Computer/Inbox On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 11:02 +0100, Michael Graham wrote: On 4/29/05, Jeffrey Stedfast [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:04 +0100

Re: [Evolution] Re: Re: Re: New evolution user questions

2005-04-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:04 +0100, Michael Graham wrote: On Tue, 19 Apr 2005 10:34:27 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 18:33 +0100, Michael Graham wrote: The default location? Whenever I add any account the default has always been the e-mail address. But I've managed

Re: [Evolution] Character set not supported by Internet?

2005-04-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
avoid this? Steve -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution] Re: Re: New evolution user questions

2005-04-19 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 18:33 +0100, Michael Graham wrote: On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:04:25 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: What is the purpose of the On This Computer mailbox? I assumed that it would look at /var/mail but it doesn't (or does it and I'm just being rubbish?) and if doesn't can I

Re: [Evolution] Losing Info

2005-04-19 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
make sure the %gconf.xml files and directories are writable. sounds like they aren't. Jeff On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 05:38 +0930, Mike wrote: Hi all Just upgraded from mandrake 10.1 with Evolution 2.0.3 to Mandrake 10.2 with Evolution 2.0.4. This was a clean install with the data from

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel summary locking

2005-04-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
pretty sure the code is correct Jeff On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 20:33 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: This comment (camel/camel-private.h:124) does not agree with the code: GMutex *ref_lock; /* for reffing/unreffing messageinfo's ALWAYS obtain before summary_lock */ From

Re: [Evolution] Re: New evolution user questions

2005-04-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
the folder, it's a virtual folder that doesn't actually exist on the server. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Indication of encrypted and/or verified signature

2005-04-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Lee wrote: On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:32 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: no, because it is possible to sign multiple individual parts rather than the entire message, so we cannot move the icon to the top. Surely that would be by far the exception rather than the rule, no? So in the cases

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Indication of encrypted and/or verified signature

2005-04-08 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
rather than the entire message, so we cannot move the icon to the top. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Preliminary patches to add inline PGP support

2005-04-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
be significant changes to the gpg-context code to make it output a mime part from a non-mime-part stream. it may require api changes to camel-cipher-context to do it the way you're planning on it. not sure how best to solve this. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Preliminary patches to add inline PGP support

2005-04-06 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
. whatever's cleanest -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Preliminary patches to add inline PGP support

2005-04-05 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
valid or invalid) please email them to me at [EMAIL PROTECTED], please include in the subject a short description of what the message is (ie. encrypted jpeg or invalid inline signature) Looking forward to your feedback :) Regards -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL

Re: [Evolution-hackers] nspr.h question

2005-04-05 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
probably the path returned by pkg-config --cflags mozilla-nspr isn't the right path Jeff On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 15:04 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: I'm building evolution eds from CVS, and ran into a slight problem where it would not detect my NSPR headers, unless I gave the

Re: [Evolution] Indication of new mail in Inbox

2005-04-05 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
this is hard-coded in there. On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:14 +0200, Vaclav Hala wrote: Hello, I use Evo 2.2.1.1 on FreeBSD 5.3. How can I indicate new mail in Inbox (and other folders) with bold font?? Thanks, V.Hala ___ evolution

Re: [Evolution-hackers] bounties

2005-04-01 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
, that's not on the website? Lee ___ evolution-hackers maillist - evolution-hackers@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Evolution] Importing from KMail -- Lost Messages

2005-03-31 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
please see http://www.jwz.org/doc/content-length.html Stricter parsing of the ``From '' separator line doesn't help either, because there are many, many variations on what goes in that line (since it was never standardized either); and also, some mail readers include that line verbatim when

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution functionality

2005-03-28 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
much simpler. could we have used maildir instead? sure, but it was decided to go with mbox because that's what other unix mailers use. (mbox and maildir both have their drawbacks) -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: [Evolution] problems switching from 2.0.3 to 2.2.1: can't sendemail via imap

2005-03-28 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
fell back to TLS fejj if SSL failed? -JP -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Verifying an Inline PGP message

2005-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
CamelMultipartSigned derives from CamelMultipart which has interfaces for adding/removing/etc parts. Jeff On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 00:30 +1300, Matt Brown wrote: Hi, Thanks to some excellent help from NotZed on IRC I'm making good progress on my e-plugin to handle inline pgp messages.

Re: [Evolution] Evolution 2.0 does not save my send mail

2005-03-17 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
check your account settings and make sure that you are looking at the correct Sent folder (e.g. the one specified in the account settings) Jeff On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 15:18 +0100, zio budda wrote: Hi, I have a strange problem. My home is on a NFS server. I have used Evolution-2.0 (Suse 9.2)

Re: [Evolution] Help me switch to evolution

2005-03-16 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
recall the request # off the top of my head) -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Copyright infringement in alternate calendar code

2005-03-15 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 16:31 +0330, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 13:21 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: ...hmm. there can always be infringements of lgpl or gpl. i'd recommend to post follow-ups to those postings My first email is really a follow-up to the first email,

Re: [Evolution] Way to select various messages that are non-contigous in message pane?

2005-03-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
this is just how ALL list/tree widgets work since the dawn of time on all platforms. I doubt most software documents it simply because it's common knowledge just like you wouldn't document how to click a button. Jeff On Mon, 2005-03-14 at 11:02 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon,

Re: [Evolution] import assistant does not find mozilla mails on linux

2005-03-14 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
___ evolution maillist - evolution@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [Evolution] Creating a top level new directory under a maildir folder?

2005-03-12 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 12:05 -0700, Evolution List wrote: I am toying with maildirs in Evolution to see if I might not be able use this storage format in place of the default mbox format and am still somewhat confused regarding how to use it under Evolution. One aspect that is confusing is

Re: [Evolution] Race condition?

2005-03-09 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 11:27 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: When a new message arrives it often shows up in my Inbox and then quickly disappears after being grabbed by an input filter and refiled somewhere else. This is confusing to say the least, but may also be related to a phenomenon

Re: [Evolution-hackers] inline gpg support bounty

2005-03-08 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 15:23 -0500, JP Rosevear wrote: On Tue, 2005-03-08 at 10:47 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:54 +1300, Matt Brown wrote: 2) Required Support The bounty lists the require functionality as support of inline-pgp emails, with an extension

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >