Bounce, or Redirect, is available in Evolution: Actions-Forward as - Redirect
I'm not sure what you mean by Bounce for SPAM though. Can you explain what this feature does?
a.
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 19:05 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
KMail and other clients have that capability.
On 21-May-2004
Ooooh, advanced email analyst... I want that job mommy. ;^)
Lol, yea that sould like it would pay alot!
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Job 317 wrote:
If this is true then you have provided the single most helpful answer to
my initial inquiry. I shall look more into how other email clients do
this.
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:52 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
Hello group,
Where can I find information about future releases and feature additions
for Evolution?
I think someone has already answered that, i'm not sure if its up to date right at this moment though.
Specifically, I am interested in
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 14:56, Ron Johnson wrote:
Regarding in-line PGP, the developers are tired of answering the
same question that has been asked twice a week since forever.
Although it does make you wonder what bizarre twist of temporary
insanity goes on in Jeff's head that he actually writes
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:16, Ron Johnson wrote:
[...]
Or, better yet, put it in the mailing list signature.
The MLM that PostgreSQL uses (or maybe it's just a bit of bash)
allows them to put a rotating set of tips from the FAQ in the
mailing list signature. Maybe Ximian could do the same.
Hello group,
Where can I find information about future releases and feature additions
for Evolution?
Specifically, I am interested in knowing when the next major release of
Evolution is due.
Also, whether this version will support PGP Inline. If not, when.
Third, I would like a Bounce option
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:52, Job 317 wrote:
Where can I find information about future releases and feature additions
for Evolution?
Specifically, I am interested in knowing when the next major release of
Evolution is due.
2.0: Q3
Third, I would like a Bounce option for SPAM. Is this
KMail and other clients have that capability.
On 21-May-2004 17:57:16 +0200, you wrote:
Third, I would like a Bounce option for SPAM. Is this available? If
not,
will it be?
You can't do that at the MUA level, only at the MTA
On 21-May-2004 17:57:20 +0200, you wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:52, Job 317 wrote:
Where can I find information about future releases and feature
additions
for Evolution?
Specifically, I am interested in knowing when the next major release
of
Evolution is due.
2.0: Q3
Great.
oh, and just because kmail has it doesn't make it a good idea. in
fact, it is probably a good reason NOT to have it (I think a lot of the
kmail features are crack).
Jeff
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 19:08 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
On 21-May-2004
I don't understand your anger. I am a client and user of Evolution. I
believe Novell traditionally does not treat their customers in this
manner.
The Bounce function has may useful applications. I believe in my
original post I admitted the exact point you made in that most spammers
either don't
Again, I am unsure of your source of agitation. I am making comparrisons
between e-mail clients and it is a useful feature that come clients have
chosen to implement. I like Evolution a lot. Actually, it is my favorite
client for Linux and my desire is to see it blow everyone else away with
its
I get enough spurious bounce messages to have formed a strong opinion
that bounce messages are a major contribution to needless mailbox
clutter and a disservice to users in 99% of instances. It once was true
that bounce messages invariably came from machines to which I had
actually sent messages
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 19:44 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
Also, if a user wants plausible deniability in not being notified of an
unpleasant event (say, dinner on Friday with an undesireable
acquaintance), a bounce of their original would make it appear that
either you no longer hold that e-mail
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 19:49 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
Again, I am unsure of your source of agitation. I am making comparrisons
between e-mail clients and it is a useful feature that come clients have
chosen to implement. I like Evolution a lot. Actually, it is my favorite
client for Linux and my
The Bounce function has may useful applications.
If, by bounce you mean redirect, then it's at
Actions - Forward as - Redirect
(and has been since 1.2 I think) and that is indeed useful. If you mean
bounce as in return to sender, then that's an MTA function, not an
MUA function, and is
I repeat, you can't bounce a message at the MUA. It's like not answering
a phone call after you've answered the phone. You maybe can return to
sender, but it's not a bounce if it's been accepted by your MTA. If it's
been accepted by your MTA, to the spammer, he's got what he wanted.
However, it
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:52 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
Hello group,
Where can I find information about future releases and feature additions
for Evolution?
http://www.gnome.org/projects/evolution or some such.
Specifically, I am interested in knowing when the next major release of
Evolution
Thank you. That's the first civil reply you've sent yet in this thread.
JOB
On 21-May-2004 21:04:18 +0200, you wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 16:52 +0200, Job 317 wrote:
Hello group,
Where can I find information about future releases and feature
additions
for Evolution?
If this is true then you have provided the single most helpful answer to
my initial inquiry. I shall look more into how other email clients do
this. Perhaps a more skilled e-mail analyst might be able to tell the
difference between a truly bounced e-mail and an email bounced
artificially from an
My $.02
As part (lurker) on the qMail user list and a Mail admin in my own rite
I would have to agree that in today's mail environment bounces are of
little value and are more often a qualification for immediate drop.
Too much spam..
As example... one of my home domains was online all of two
Ooooh, advanced email analyst... I want that job mommy. ;^)
--- J A Miller (Linuxdevr)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.chipnet.homelinux.com/
On Fri, 21 May 2004, Job 317 wrote:
If this is true then you have provided the single most helpful answer to
my initial inquiry. I shall look more into
22 matches
Mail list logo
