Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.5.7/spamassassin Junk folder messages marked read by default?

2004-04-29 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:14 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote: On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:04 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: The problem is that the Junk folder is implemented as a vFolder and not a physical folder. Thus, if we were to leave the \Seen flag unset when marking a message as Junk, then

Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.5.7/spamassassin Junk folder messages marked read by default?

2004-04-28 Thread Rick DeNatale
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 11:14 -0500, Chuck Mattsen wrote: On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:04 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: The problem is that the Junk folder is implemented as a vFolder and not a physical folder. Thus, if we were to leave the \Seen flag unset when marking a message as Junk, then

[Evolution] Evo 1.5.7/spamassassin Junk folder messages marked read by default?

2004-04-27 Thread Chuck Mattsen
It would seem that anything caught by Evo's spamassassin and sent to the Junk folder is marked read by default, hence no count shows up in the folder tree for the Junk folder and the user must manually check the folder periodically. Is it just me, or wouldn't it be more sensible to have the

Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.5.7/spamassassin Junk folder messages marked read by default?

2004-04-27 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
The problem is that the Junk folder is implemented as a vFolder and not a physical folder. Thus, if we were to leave the \Seen flag unset when marking a message as Junk, then the message would also be counted as unread in the Inbox folder which confused users in earlier development releases.

Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.5.7/spamassassin Junk folder messages marked read by default?

2004-04-27 Thread Chuck Mattsen
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 12:04 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: The problem is that the Junk folder is implemented as a vFolder and not a physical folder. Thus, if we were to leave the \Seen flag unset when marking a message as Junk, then the message would also be counted as unread in the Inbox