Re: [Evolution] Evolution to Evolution Sync?

2001-11-29 Thread Ed Wilts
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 13:52, John Sturgeon wrote: > Ty, > > Since this seem like it's a pretty critical feature for you, have you > though of plunking down $50 for a used Palm on eBay, and using it to > 'sync' all of your evo's together? I have a palm, and I use it to sync > my home evolution wi

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 10:03:55PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 21:27, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:33:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 20:15, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > > > It takes care of escaping the "^From " for you

[Evolution] gtkhtml 1.0??

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Hensley
A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught up yet, or is there some disconnect? Dan __

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 21:27, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:33:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 20:15, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > > It takes care of escaping the "^From " for you so you don't have to > > > worry about it. > > > > That's nice, but it d

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 21:27, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:33:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 20:15, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > > It takes care of escaping the "^From " for you so you don't have to > > > worry about it. > > > > That's nice, but it d

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:33:42PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 20:15, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > It takes care of escaping the "^From " for you so you don't have to > > worry about it. > > That's nice, but it doesn't take care of QP encoding it and I'm not too > sure that

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
...and if you're on DOS, "piping it to pgp" has text in the canonical CRLF format, whereas in Unix it doesn't. Also, if the text contains 8bit text, do we QP encode before or after we sign it? If we QP encode before, will the other mailer know to feed the encoded text to pgp? Or will it assume th

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 20:15, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > It takes care of escaping the "^From " for you so you don't have to > worry about it. That's nice, but it doesn't take care of QP encoding it and I'm not too sure that it CRLF encodes it either. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Xim

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:10:15PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 19:50, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:33:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > > > In-line pgp mode is a broken way to do it - so many things can go > > > "wrong". Should I first Q

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Winship
> The problem is that you guys don't fully understand the problem, to you > it sounds as simple as "just pipe it to pgp or gpg and whallah" but it's > not that simple. Well, not if you expect the other end to be able to > verify your signatures at least. Sure, I could just pipe to pgp/gpg, but > i

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 19:50, Thomas O'Dowd wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:33:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > In-line pgp mode is a broken way to do it - so many things can go > > "wrong". Should I first QP/Base64 encode the text before signing? or > > should I do it afterward? Do

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Thomas O'Dowd
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:33:32PM -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > In-line pgp mode is a broken way to do it - so many things can go > "wrong". Should I first QP/Base64 encode the text before signing? or > should I do it afterward? Do I From-escape before? afterward? ever? Do I > CRLF encode b

Re: [Evolution] Bug? Replying in Netscape and charsets

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
Netscape bug. Jeff (aka someone who is getting tired of having to work around bugs in other mailers, we have enough problems of our own) On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 14:47, Jason Tackaberry wrote: > When I send an HTML mail in evo and reply using Netscape (in Windows), > many and sometimes all of the

Re: [Evolution] 0.99.2: attachement issue

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Winship
> I can't see no menu to do anything with that attachements as is there > usually with attached text or images. This is essentially correct: the message has asked evolution to present the attachment in a completely useless way, and so it has. It would be nice to have some way to deal with messag

Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 13:08, Scott Otterson wrote: > Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > There really isn't a "standard IMAP trash folder" thing. > > Hmm... yes, I suppose the IMAP standard doesn't require a trash folder. > > > We use a virtual Trash folder, but we might add support for a physical >

Re: [Evolution] Evolution to Evolution Sync?

2001-11-29 Thread John Sturgeon
Ty, Since this seem like it's a pretty critical feature for you, have you though of plunking down $50 for a used Palm on eBay, and using it to 'sync' all of your evo's together? I have a palm, and I use it to sync my home evolution with my work evolution. It works quite well. -john sturgeon <>

Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Winship
> Any chance that a true IMAP trash > folder could be implemented sooner than 1.2 or 1.4? No. 1.0 has been feature-frozen for quite a while now. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Features possible?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
go to the Filter dialog and look at the "Expression" drop-down. Jeff On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 15:42, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 12:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 02:27, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > > > > > > Here's a thought on an advanced UI for that... It's n

Re: [Evolution] Contacts

2001-11-29 Thread Tim Adamec
I've had no responses at all on this. It appears to be some sort of problem with gnome-db. I'm going back to pine. On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 17:20, Tim Adamec wrote: > Hello. > > I sent a query on this a few days (weeks?) ago, but haven't seen anybody > respond so I thought I'd send another. > >

[Evolution] Bug? Replying in Netscape and charsets

2001-11-29 Thread Jason Tackaberry
When I send an HTML mail in evo and reply using Netscape (in Windows), many and sometimes all of the characters are rendered as blocks. (See the attached screenshot). It seems only text within some sort of or or markup gets mangled. I noticed when viewing the HTML source for the original ema

[Evolution] printing

2001-11-29 Thread E. Joshua Rigler
I just attempted to print two emails. The first one printed with a nice size font, and everything justified properly, and fit on a single page. Only a minute later, running the same session of Evolution, I printed a very similar email, and it used fonts that were much too big, and everything did

Re: [Evolution] Features possible?

2001-11-29 Thread Ben FrantzDale
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 12:33, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 02:27, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > > > > Here's a thought on an advanced UI for that... It's not perfect but I > > can't think of a better way: > > > > Execute actions [if logical expression is met] > > (a) Recipients

Re: [Evolution] imap trash folder

2001-11-29 Thread Scott Otterson
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > There really isn't a "standard IMAP trash folder" thing. Hmm... yes, I suppose the IMAP standard doesn't require a trash folder. > We use a virtual Trash folder, but we might add support for a physical > trash folder for maybe 1.2 or 1.4 or something. I looked at ho

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 17:52, Levente Farkas wrote: > Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > It works for me... although someone reported a bug saying that when a > > recipient's gpg key is not signed, when sending them encrypted mail, it > > only encrypts to the sender's key. > > yes it's true thre rec

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Zot O'Connor
I use cyrus imap (and pop). Setup is easy, and there are tools for tranfer. I have never seen a lock up problem with it. I have actually opened multiple evo's to the same mailbox (and hammered it). Cyrus is a bit different in that all mail stays under the cyrus account and is stored in a centr

Re: [Evolution] to be usable

2001-11-29 Thread John Sturgeon
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 03:32, Levente Farkas wrote: [snip] > 2) There is a "--\n" before your signature, because technically, that's > how signatures are supposed to be formatted. Mail RFC's and > recommendation documents use this separator to break the signature from > th

Re: [Evolution] sync ignores categories

2001-11-29 Thread John Sturgeon
If you use Outlook as a model, then yep.. it would pick the first category, and use that one for the palm. (Hey... that Alt-q thing really worked!) -john <>< On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 23:56, Gerhard Schuck wrote: Hallo, sync with the new RC2 version of evolution worked generally fine.

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 05:25, Levente Farkas wrote: > hi, > and at last gpg simple unusable with evolution. when I try send an encripted > mail with evo (I have to go to the menu and click on a menu item, it > would be much simpler if I able to check it somewhere within the > composer window and I

Re: [Evolution] Features possible?

2001-11-29 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 02:27, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > > Here's a thought on an advanced UI for that... It's not perfect but I > can't think of a better way: > > Execute actions [if logical expression is met] > (a) Recipients contains foo > (b) Sender contains [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Evolution] serious problem in rc versions

2001-11-29 Thread Martin
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 21:16, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > This is a mail client right? > So why is it I can't create mail in it? > Whenever I try to create mail I get a message that informs me that the > folder of type Mail died. > Then the Mail module is gone. > I have to r

[Evolution] crash on startup

2001-11-29 Thread Francois Schoubben
Hi, I've just install Evolution 0.99.2 on a Debian potato machine, and i have the following message when i try to launch it... --- evolution-shell-WARNING **: Cannot access Bonobo/ConfigDatabase on wombat: (IDL:OAF/GeneralError:1.0) --- Of course, evolution stop just after. Any idea of how i can c

Re: [Evolution] multiple email addresses -follow up question

2001-11-29 Thread John Sturgeon
Ralph, simply type their name in, right click to select e-mail (or use the down arrow to select it), type a comma, type their name again, and repeat the process, choosing their other e-mail. -john <>< On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 19:20, Ralph Sanford wrote: On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 14:59, Dan Winship

Re: [Evolution] Changing folders redraws and slow

2001-11-29 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
I checked bugzilla and didn't see any bugs or discussion about this (surprisingly). Maybe I missed something. I was thinking how much more polished Evo would feel if the component view didn't blank and redraw every time I changed a folder. Is this a Bonobo issue? Are there any plans in

[Evolution] 0.99.2: attachement issue

2001-11-29 Thread Jens Ansorg
Hi, I just got two mails, both containing an attachement that is apparently a DOS-Virus (.EXE) Looks like Evo displays those attachements as content of an IFRAME or positioned DIV element. Only, this Element ist just 1x1 cm in size, with scrollbars. I can't see no menu to do anything with that

Re: [Evolution] serious problem in rc versions

2001-11-29 Thread Ettore Perazzoli
This is a mail client right? So why is it I can't create mail in it? Whenever I try to create mail I get a message that informs me that the folder of type Mail died. Then the Mail module is gone. I have to restart Evo to be able to manage mail again. The only way so far is to reply to a m

Re: [Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Levente Farkas
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 05:25, Levente Farkas wrote: > > hi, > > and at last gpg simple unusable with evolution. when I try send an encripted > > mail with evo (I have to go to the menu and click on a menu item, it > > would be much simpler if I able to check it somewher

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Ian Castle
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 14:31, Trevor Nichols wrote: > I'm using that same IMAP server on a FreeBSD box, same problem. Do you > know of / are there another easily configurable IMAP server which does > allow multiple connections of the same mailbox? > Cyrus-imapd allows multiple connections. Requi

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Winship
> I'm using that same IMAP server on a FreeBSD box, same problem. Do you > know of / are there another easily configurable IMAP server which does > allow multiple connections of the same mailbox? AFAIK, *all* other IMAP servers allow multiple concurrent accesses. I really dislike UW imapd for a

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread John Ehrlinger
> The "broken pipe" is certainly an IMAP issue, I agree. > But the part about duplicate mails is probably not. I think it's an Evo > bug, and that's what I'm interested about. > > Xav I've got a bug open on the duplicate mail from an IMAP server. I'm trying to collect info on it now. The

[Evolution] Summary and folder mismatch, even after a sync

2001-11-29 Thread Fred Chagnon
Using Evolution 0.99.2, I get this error periodically when I select or deselect specific subfolders of my Inbox. (It's also happening with the trash foler). Once this starts happening to a folder I can't expunge any messages from it. The only workaround I've found is to delete the folder...quit

Re: [Evolution] Evolution to Evolution Sync?

2001-11-29 Thread Chris Tooley
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 23:30, Ty Norton wrote: > On Mon, 2001-11-26 at 08:34, JP Rosevear wrote: > > On Sun, 2001-11-25 at 05:36, Ty Norton wrote: > > > I was wondering if there was any way to sync between evolution clients. > > > > > > Seemed like it would save me some hastle if I could suck all

Re: [Evolution] Spel Cheking Subjec Lions

2001-11-29 Thread Dan Winship
On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 20:14, Zot O'Connor wrote: > How hard would it be to spell check Subject lines like the message body. Not *too* hard. There's a bug for it in bugzilla. -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/m

Re: [Evolution] Features possible?

2001-11-29 Thread Jason Tackaberry
> Execute actions [if logical expression is met] > (a) Recipients contains foo > (b) Sender contains [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (c) Message Body contains bork > > Logical expression: [((a&b)|c)|(~b&c)] This would be _great_. It could be hidden behind some "Advanced" button

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Trevor Nichols
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 23:58, Ross Burton wrote: > Its the IMAP server. imapd is the University of Washington IMAP server > which doesn't like multiple connections. I believe if there are > multiple simultaneous connections it will drop the original connection. > The behaviour however is weird,

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Xavier Bestel
le jeu 29-11-2001 à 14:28, Ross Burton a écrit : > On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 10:23, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > I have 2 Evo (on different computers) running against the same IMAP > > server (Debian potato's stock imapd). It seems they compete for the IMAP > > connection, 'cause I often have a little win

[Evolution] Importing Cotacts into a LDAP List

2001-11-29 Thread Scott Comboni
Is there a easy way to drag and drop or import as vcard local contacts to a LDAP contact lists? Thanks Scott ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Re: [Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Ross Burton
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 10:23, Xavier Bestel wrote: > I have 2 Evo (on different computers) running against the same IMAP > server (Debian potato's stock imapd). It seems they compete for the IMAP > connection, 'cause I often have a little window which says "unable to > fetch message xxx: broken pip

Re: [Evolution] to be usable

2001-11-29 Thread Levente Farkas
Mark Neill wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Levente Farkas wrote: > > - I'm not able to import my netscape addressbook! without this feature > > no one with switch to evo from netscape. I try to export to ldif my > > addressbook, but I've got a few "Importer not ready. Wait 5 seconds." > > o

Re: [Evolution] synchronizing memo pad???

2001-11-29 Thread Håvard Wigtil
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 01:03, Marcel Turcotte wrote: > Hi All, > > I recently switched from JPilot to evolution to synchronize > my neo handspring with my desktop; therefore, I am now using > gpilotd, but I cannot find a conduit and associated solution > for Linux. I wonder what's your solution to

[Evolution] Evolution vs Evolution

2001-11-29 Thread Xavier Bestel
I have 2 Evo (on different computers) running against the same IMAP server (Debian potato's stock imapd). It seems they compete for the IMAP connection, 'cause I often have a little window which says "unable to fetch message xxx: broken pipe". Now, the problem is that sometimes, when Evo tries to

[Evolution] pgp unusable?

2001-11-29 Thread Levente Farkas
hi, and at last gpg simple unusable with evolution. when I try send an encripted mail with evo (I have to go to the menu and click on a menu item, it would be much simpler if I able to check it somewhere within the composer window and I always be able to see wheter it will be encrypted or not).

[Evolution] Interesting glitch

2001-11-29 Thread Lonnie Borntreger
I don't use the preview pane.  It allows me to clean out a lot of spam without downloading it.  Once I get rid of the crud, I open the first interesting email (which opens the a message viewing window), and start moving/deleting through the messages. Here's the interesting part.  The focus d