On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 10:12, D. D. Brierton wrote:
what is stranger is this: Evolution is using [EMAIL PROTECTED] for all
replies (it's the first account in the list) despite the fact that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is my default address and [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
actually disabled (it doesn't hav a
Running Evolution 1.1.1 on Mandrake 8.2
I've just read over the earlier thread on this topic beginning at:
http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/evolution/2002-September/021289.html
I'd like to say that I agree with those who'd like to see the older
behaviour back. I use fetchmail to pull in
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 23:16, Alessio Bragadini may have wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey Stedfast may have wrote:
1.1.x defaults to the X-Evolution-Source first, and then checks.
So, I believe the concerns of a lot of users (including me) who just
wanted the old way to be
Op do 12-09-2002, om 08:16 schreef Alessio Bragadini:
So, I believe the concerns of a lot of users (including me) who just
wanted the old way to be maintained haven't been taken into account...
I do not know the old way, but what I would like is when the account is
determined by the mailbox
Then you need to try 1.1.1 and see if it works for you, and if not
explain in detail what it's doing and what you expect it to do and what
the headers are (well, to/cc/x-evolution-source/etc)
Jeff
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 02:16, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey
1.1.x defaults to the X-Evolution-Source first, and then checks.
I am interested to know what the old way is? If you would, explain a
scenario where the 1.1.x way behaves in an undesirable manner?
AFAIK: in 1.0, first are checked the 'To:' and 'Cc:' fields, then the
'X-Evo-Source'.
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 07:46, Lloyd D Budd wrote:
I am interested to know what the old way is? If you would, explain a
scenario where the 1.1.x way behaves in an undesirable manner?
[Disclaimer - I've not tried 1.1.x for a while - 2 months or so - so if
there has been a change recently then
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 13:14, Chief Gadgeteer wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 00:16, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
*and others wrote:
I have a number of websites that I admin, some are on the same servers.
If I query the pop accounts
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 11:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 13:14, Chief Gadgeteer wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 00:16, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
*and others wrote:
I have a number of websites that I admin, some are
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 04:36, Chief Gadgeteer wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 11:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 13:14, Chief Gadgeteer wrote:
On Thu, 2002-09-12 at 00:16, Alessio Bragadini wrote:
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
*and others wrote:
Hello,
As I've been using Ximian for multiple accounts for quite some time now,
there's something that I'm hoping has either already been recognized
and/or fixed in the upcoming versions. Since this account is not my main
account for Evo, I have troubles when responding to emails from
The logic in 1.0.x wasn't quite right and wouldn't use the
X-Evolution-Source to find the account except as a last resort (and
apparently it thinks it has found you before getting to that code?).
1.1.x defaults to the X-Evolution-Source first, and then checks.
Jeff
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 09:39,
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 20:34, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
1.1.x defaults to the X-Evolution-Source first, and then checks.
So, I believe the concerns of a lot of users (including me) who just
wanted the old way to be maintained haven't been taken into account...
--
Alessio F. Bragadini
13 matches
Mail list logo