On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
Second, a different IMAP mailer on a
different machine, say emacs or outlook, won't know anything about evo's
virtual folder; all it could do is to look at the unexpunged email.
That's undesirable since a user would need to scroll
You can configure Outlook to not show deleted messages
Outlook has 2 modes for IMAP, 1 is where they show deleted messages
and the other is where they move deleted messages to a Trash folder.
Jeff
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:08, Dwight Hubbard wrote:
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 18:04, Jeffrey Stedfast
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 11:43, Mark Neill wrote:
This is not true. Deleting a message in evolution, then accessing the
imap folder with outlook shows the deleted message message. At least
with Exchange as the imap server.
Deleting a message in outlook and going into the folder with
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There really isn't a standard IMAP trash folder thing.
Hmm... yes, I suppose the IMAP standard doesn't require a trash folder.
We use a virtual Trash folder, but we might add support for a physical
trash folder for maybe 1.2 or 1.4 or something.
I looked at how
On Thu, 2001-11-29 at 13:08, Scott Otterson wrote:
Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
There really isn't a standard IMAP trash folder thing.
Hmm... yes, I suppose the IMAP standard doesn't require a trash folder.
We use a virtual Trash folder, but we might add support for a physical
trash
Any chance that a true IMAP trash
folder could be implemented sooner than 1.2 or 1.4?
No. 1.0 has been feature-frozen for quite a while now.
-- Dan
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lambart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:51 PM
To: Zot O'Connor; NotZed
Cc: Evolution List
Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP Trash folder?
I find it really annoying to
lose my
Sorry. That last message was re-sent by accident.
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:08, Rich Rudnick wrote:
What metaphor has a piece of paper in two places simultaneously?
hmm.. that would break the theory of relativity.
but, I don't see evolution as broken. View the trash folder as all
messages in all folders that are marked for deletion.
You
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 01:24, John N S Gill wrote:
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 07:08, Rich Rudnick wrote:
What metaphor has a piece of paper in two places simultaneously?
I get the impression I'm missing something here about the way you are
working with evolution.. but I can't figure out
How about instead of Trash it's called vTrash?
Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
either a Trash folder or a vTrash folder.
--
Mike Sangrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Landisburg, Pa.
The first one last wins.
A net of highly
10/24/2001 9:03:59 AM, Mike Sangrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about instead of Trash it's called vTrash?
Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
either a Trash folder or a vTrash folder.
Yeah, I seriously think the best (and SAFEST) interim solution should
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 12:50, Eric Lambart wrote:
10/24/2001 9:03:59 AM, Mike Sangrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about instead of Trash it's called vTrash?
Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
either a Trash folder or a vTrash folder.
Yeah, I
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 09:50, Eric Lambart wrote:
10/24/2001 9:03:59 AM, Mike Sangrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about instead of Trash it's called vTrash?
Sometime in the future (after 1.0) you could enable the user to choose
either a Trash folder or a vTrash folder.
Yeah, I
10/24/2001 10:09:24 AM, Mike Sangrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think people would think `vTrash' is anymore a typo than
`vFolders'. And the `v' leans toward a commonly accepted convention.
At least it feels that way to me.
Also, if you stick `Trash' down in `vFolders' I would have
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:09:24PM -0400, Mike Sangrey wrote:
Also, if you stick `Trash' down in `vFolders' I would have assumed THAT
`Trash' folder had something to do with stuff deleted out of `vFolders'
and that REALLY gets confusing.
I think this is the problem: The term Trash has a
Bret Mogilefsky wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 01:09:24PM -0400, Mike Sangrey wrote:
Also, if you stick `Trash' down in `vFolders' I would have assumed THAT
`Trash' folder had something to do with stuff deleted out of `vFolders'
and that REALLY gets confusing.
I think this is the problem: The
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:26:52PM -0400, Mike Sangrey wrote:
On Wed, 2001-10-24 at 13:51, Bret Mogilefsky wrote:
My suggestion? Rename Trash to Deleted Items and put it down among the
vFolders. (You can pick something shorter/more specific than Deleted
Items, as long as it doesn't
You will eventually be able to do trash the normal way.
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6061
___
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
I've got procmail running on my IMAP server, and some messages are being
refiled into the Trash. However, Evolution doesn't seem to be able to
see any messages in the Trash folder - it seems like this folder is
special. Is this intentional? It does make it next to impossible to
empty the IMAP
The folder called Trash that appears in your IMAP folder tree is
actually a vfolder of all messages with the deleted flag set in all
your IMAP folders.
I think that currently, if you have a real folder named Trash on your
IMAP server, there's no way to see it.
WOW isn't this
This was not meant as flame blait. I am shocked the evo would do this,
unless other clients are doing this.
I have not seen a client do this behavior, I thought most POP client did
a local move to Trash (like a IMAP move).
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 16:45, NotZed wrote:
Can you please take your
10/23/2001 4:56:20 PM, Zot O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was not meant as flame blait. I am shocked the evo would do this,
unless other clients are doing this.
I have not seen a client do this behavior, I thought most POP client did
a local move to Trash (like a IMAP move).
Most POP
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 17:50, Eric Lambart wrote:
10/23/2001 4:56:20 PM, Zot O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have not seen a client do this behavior, I thought most POP client did
a local move to Trash (like a IMAP move).
Most POP clients do. I sure wish Evo did it this way. vFolders
On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 18:19, Eric Newman wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Lambart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 5:51 PM
To: Zot O'Connor; NotZed
Cc: Evolution List
Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP Trash folder?
I find it really annoying
25 matches
Mail list logo
