[Evolution-hackers] [Aart Scheepers info@jentgemert.nl] Signatures
Hi, I am currently using evolution (0.10) with great pleasure. But now I stumbled on something with the signatures. As I am part of an organisation, and am using private mail, all with evolution, I would like to have different signatures for each. I set up two email accounts, with different signature files. When clicking on compose, I get the signature of the first (default) account. There is as far as I see, no way to have the signature of the other account in there. Maybe there should be a menu-item: Compose message for account such and such? Aart. Ps. Keep up the great work ! -- This message was send by Aart Scheepers E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ:73408952 Linux user: 177526 Sent from linux machine 78481 ( Digdas ) Quote of the day... Work smarter, not harder, and be careful of your speling. Disclaimer: Interpretation of the characters in this message are subject to change. Correctness of either the contents or the universe is not verified by me! No Microsoft products were used in any way for the creation of this message If you are using a Microsoft product ot view it, BEWARE! - I'm not responsible for any harm you might encounter as a result! ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Multiple Calendar Support
On 23 May 2001 23:06:27 -0400, Russell Steinthal wrote: It's not immediately related to my problem, but why do you need query_done? Isn't the idea that since they are live queries, you just hook your add-to-graphical-view function onto the obj_updated signal and process them as they come in? Or is query_done more useful for a search dialog box type of snapshot? We have the same thing in addressbook (sequence_complete). This is useful in many cases. I think it was originally added for printing support so that the print code could know that it was ready to push the image to the printer. It's also useful for turning off a progress indicator to let the user know that they're seeing the final set of contacts or events. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
Re: [Evolution-hackers] Multiple Calendar Support
You need to give the user a way of picking the current calendar as explained above. Instead of showing a list of URIs we should allow the user to name the calendars so that you get a list with My personal calendar Company calendar Concert calendar from www.yourlocalsymphonyorchestra.org Movie schedule from www.cinemex.com.mx Names should at least be an option; URI's are a second-best fallback. Naming them, however, requires a centralized database of some sort... (Unless you use them only to select among already loaded calendars, rather than allowing the user to Include/Exclude them based on their name.) Maybe an XML file stored in ~/evolution or a system-wide dir? I'm concerned about how all of this fits into the Evolution shell. When you click on a mail folder in /local, you're looking at a specific file stored in ~/evolution/local/. Is this not the way the calendar is going to work? That seems annoyingly inconsistent if so. One nice fix might be calendar vfolders. Then you can have your local calendar in /local, and remote calendars in various remote calendar storages, and a calendar vfolder to merge them together. (And then, the issue of current calendar goes away: you can't add appointments to a calendar vfolder, you have to go to the relevant real calendar. Or alternately, a calendar vfolder has a specific implied current calendar.) -- Dan ___ evolution-hackers maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers
[Evolution] Attachment names with áóéíñ screwed up
Evo doesn't seem to parse correctly the name of an attachment when it has 'foreign' characters. This is an actual attachment. Evo displays it and prompt me to save it as: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_Seguridad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= --_=_NextPart_000_01C0E2E9.8F93CF60 Content-Type: application/msword; name==?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_Segur?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?idad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename==?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_S?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?eguridad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= -- - Juan Alonso Hernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] (34) 915 239 681 Security Team Heyde España PGP Signature: www.dharana.net/dharana.asc Fingerprint: 408A 70EF 1457 5BC4 CCB1 6324 640E 6F32 B50B 4E68 - ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 17:42:39 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: It works for RH 6.2, maybe it's a packaging problem with RH 7.1. What's suspicious here is that your file output is quite different from what I get $ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB 2.X Hash/Little Endian (Version 5, Logical sequence number: file - 0, offset - 0, Bucket Size 4096, Overflow Point 3, Last Freed 0, Max Bucket 5, High Mask 0x7, Low Mask 0x3, Fill Factor 0, Number of Keys 65) although the alleged version is the same. My db package is as follows $ rpm -qa | grep '^db' db3-3.1.17-4.6x I'm almost positive you're using db2. Version 5 is the db2 version. Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Contact list missing - resolved
On 24 May 2001 09:22:12 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: - Original Message - From: Christopher James Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Michael Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Evolution Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 6:40 AM Subject: Re: [Evolution] Contact list missing - resolved On 23 May 2001 09:13:28 -0400, Michael Leone wrote: Anyway, my contacts stayed availabe thru the upgrade. So I don't know if Evo is actually linking with DB2 or DB3. It's only available on RH6 and RH7 because those were the only ones linking to a weird version of libdb. All the other platforms were fine with the first release. If you're using the RH6 package, you're probably using DB2. I am - the newest Evo is the RH6.2, since there still isn't a Mandrake 7 version. I uninstalled my db2 rpm, and only installed db3 from source. So ... it should NOT be working for me? Or do you mean that db3 will access db2 files? The newest evolution package is only available on RH because you don't need it. Just use the Mandrake ones. Alternatively leave your system as it is if it works. db3 will not access db2 files but my guess is that you probably have the libraries somewhere if it is working. rpm shouldn't let you install without --nodeps if you don't have the needed libs. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 24 May 2001 08:21:21 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: On 24 May 2001 07:01:11 -0400, Christopher James Lahey wrote: On 23 May 2001 17:42:39 -0400, Fernando Pereira wrote: After some investigation, I think I agree. There's a whole mess of db versions and symbolic links to db versions in /lib: -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 788401 Jan 15 10:49 libdb-2.1.3.so -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1485823 Dec 1 18:02 libdb-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.3.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 14 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so.3 - libdb-2.1.3.so -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 221411 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1-2.1.3.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 15 Sep 26 2000 libdb1.so.2 - libdb1-2.1.3.so and /usr/lib -rw-r--r--1 root root 3684062 Jan 15 10:49 libdb.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Sep 26 2000 libdb.so - ../../lib/libdb.so.3 -rw-r--r--1 root root 972154 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 21 Sep 26 2000 libdb1.so - ../../lib/libdb1.so.2 -rw-r--r--1 root root 977006 Jan 15 10:49 libdb1_p.a -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1760542 Dec 1 18:02 libdb_cxx-3.1.so -rw-r--r--1 root root 3702978 Jan 15 10:49 libdb_p.a As you can see, /usr/lib/libdb.so links to a version 2 binary. What library file names is Evo SUPPOSED to use with the current library version?? My lib directories are not as complicated, but are also spread between /lib and /usr/lib. /usr/lib was in my /etc/ld.so.conf, /lib was not. I added /lib into /etc/ld.so.conf, but that didn't help. My lib directories - [root@localhost lib]# ls -l /usr/lib/libdb* -r--r--r--1 root root 7163034 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.a -rw-r--r--1 root root 625 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.la lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 May 24 07:12 /usr/lib/libdb-3.1.so - libdb.so.old lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb.so.2 - libdb1.so.2 lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb.so.3 - libdb2.so.3 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1516058 May 24 07:01 /usr/lib/libdb.so.old -rw-r--r--1 root root 779678 Aug 17 2000 /usr/lib/libdb1.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:21 /usr/lib/libdb1.so - libdb1.so.2 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root60752 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb1.so.2 -rw-r--r--1 root root 3203846 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb2.a lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 11 May 22 10:22 /usr/lib/libdb2.so - libdb2.so.3 -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 282064 May 22 10:24 /usr/lib/libdb2.so.3 -rw-r--r--1 root root 649 Aug 30 2000 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-3.1.la -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1733838 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 May 22 10:23 /usr/lib/libdb_tcl.so - libdb_tcl-3.1.so [root@localhost /lib]# ls -l /lib/libdb* -rwxr-xr-x1 root root 1516058 May 22 10:47 /lib/libdb-3.1.so lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 12 May 22 10:47 /lib/libdb.so - libdb-3.1.so How any of this ever works is a mystery. linux libs from what I've learned work through the library registration file /etc/ld.so.conf. If you want libraries used, list the directory in there, and run ldconfig (like lilo is run after messing with the /boot directory. -- regs rupert ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 16:27:10 -0500, John Sundberg wrote: Redhat 7.1 evolution .10 - 2 (from Redcarpet today) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ file addressbook.db addressbook.db: Berkeley DB (Hash, version 5, native byte-order) [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump185 addressbook.db db_dump185: addressbook.db: Invalid argument [jdsundberg@bear Contacts]$ db_dump addressbook.db db_dump: addressbook.db: hash version 5 requires a version upgrade db_dump: open: addressbook.db: DB_OLDVERSION: Database requires a version upgrade If I try and create a new Contact - I can fill out the form but nothing appears to be created in the the addressbook.db You have a db2 version database. RH7 packages use db3. These instructions will only work on RH7.x: In your contacts directory run: killev cp addressbook.db addressbook.db.bkup db_upgrade addressbook.db Try again. Once you're satisfied that it's working again, you can delete the backup at your leisure. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
[Evolution] reply time
sometimes when I hit reply it takes forever for the message window to come upsimilar to length of time for evo to start up...only sometimes though also ( sorry if previously covered ) I can't seem to get an email address ( when i click on TO or CC etc. ) to get put in the To or CC field when chosen.. is this somehow related to the :contacts gone thread?? db_dump185 addressbook.db.backup | db_load addressbook.db I tried that line but gave me wrong format error.. thanks lee -=-= ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are not back - ev .10 - ximian 2
On 23 May 2001 22:01:20 -0400, Rupert Heesom wrote: Hi! I've just upgraded my Evo to evolution-0.10-ximian.2 hoping to get my addressbook back, but still no addressbook. What distro are you on? Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] Attachment names witháóéíñ screwed up
Thanks, I've just entered this into bugzilla. Jeff On 24 May 2001 10:14:34 +0200, Juan Alonso Hernández wrote: Evo doesn't seem to parse correctly the name of an attachment when it has 'foreign' characters. This is an actual attachment. Evo displays it and prompt me to save it as: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_Seguridad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= --_=_NextPart_000_01C0E2E9.8F93CF60 Content-Type: application/msword; name==?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_Segur?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?idad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename==?iso-8859-1?Q?Campa=F1a_verano_2001_Experto_en_S?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?eguridad_=28oferta=29=2Edoc?= -- - Juan Alonso Hernández [EMAIL PROTECTED] (34) 915 239 681 Security Team Heyde España PGP Signature: www.dharana.net/dharana.asc Fingerprint: 408A 70EF 1457 5BC4 CCB1 6324 640E 6F32 B50B 4E68 - ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
Re: [Evolution] contacts are back!
On 23 May 2001 12:14:00 +0800, Ted Targosz wrote: Oops, thats what I get for trying to multitask...I meant to say, today I downloaded the updated 0.10 for RH 7.0 via RC and POOF my contacts are gone...whereas I have never had any contact problems b4 this. So, since you're on RH 7, I believe you are already using db3. Try this (only works with updated packages on Red Hat 7): killev cd $HOME/evolution/local/Contacts cp addressbook.db addressbook.db.tmp db_upgrade addressbook.db Then run evolution and see if your contacts are back. Alternatively, I now have code that will make evolution contacts automatically upgrade. I haven't committed this yet because of problems it would cause the snapshot builds. If you wait for 0.11 or a snapshot from the next week or so, this should autmatically fix itself. Thanks, Chris ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
