[Evolution] Extremely long link times

2001-10-23 Thread Alfons Hoogervorst
Lo, When linking something this seems to stick out like sore thumb: The link command line has more than 10 times references to libraries like libz, libdl, libXext, libX11, libSM, etc. The list really goes on and on and on. So, could this contribute to the extremely long link times I have? And,

[Fwd: Fwd: Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times]

2001-10-23 Thread Dan Hensley
without the libtool fix (which really stinks, because on my Athlon 1.2G/512MB RAM it takes 1 1/2 hours). Basically libtool 1.4 sucks rocks when it comes to dependencies. Dan --- NotZed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: NotZed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times

Re: [Fwd: Fwd: Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times]

2001-10-23 Thread Dan Hensley
sucks rocks when it comes to dependencies. Dan --- NotZed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: NotZed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfons Hoogervorst) Date: Tue

Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times

2001-10-23 Thread Dan Winship
So, could this contribute to the extremely long link times I have? Yup. And, where does the mega long link command line and duplicate lib references come from? libtool 1.4 :-/ -- Dan ___ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times

2001-10-23 Thread NotZed
This is libtools fault mostly, but also gnome-config's fault (because of limitations which pushed the problem into libtool i guess). There's a patch around for libtool 1.4 which is supposed to address it a little (try the archives). Most of the time is spend in a stupid shell script which

Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times

2001-10-23 Thread Joe Barnett
there seem to be a variety of different versions of automake/gettext/libtool and other compiler helping utilities for which evo. doesn't quite build perfectly using newer versions. is there a list somewhere (or could one be made) of the supported/recommended/working versions of these various

Re: [Evolution] Extremely long link times

2001-10-23 Thread Jeffrey Stedfast
libtool 1.4 automake 1.4 autoconf 2.13 gettext 0.10.35 (0.10.38 and 0.10.40 seem to be ok tho too, definetely don't use 0.10.36 or 0.10.37) Jeff On Tue, 2001-10-23 at 17:56, Joe Barnett wrote: there seem to be a variety of different versions of automake/gettext/libtool and other compiler