Re: [Evolution-hackers] pvl_list structure in libical

2006-07-22 Thread Harish Krishnaswamy
Hi Mathew, On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:06 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote: Hi all, I've recently started maintaining Evolution for Red Hat. snip The source code is dated November 1995 and looks to be isolated to libical. It's basically a linked-list of void pointers, and I don't see anything

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal

2006-07-22 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 00:00 +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: on 2006-07-12 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Philip Van Hoof: It simply looks like Evolution developers didn't know where to stack all these Evolution libraries. And thought .. oh, we already had this Evolution data server thing .. lets

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Camel in evolution-data-server, a different proposal

2006-07-22 Thread Ross Burton
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 12:04 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: I have customers and end-users that are building mobile devices that will *not* come with contactbook nor addressbook functionality. Why would I want to ship a libedataserver that contains 1.5 megs of functionality that my Camel isn't