Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where to put UI items for templates (Bug #127529)

2007-02-22 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:38 -0700, Sankar P wrote: If all you need is just a non-deleting draft, you can use Edit as new message. I have felt that this shouldn't be restricted to Sent-items alone as we allow configurable sent-folders. IIRC, there is a bug for this as well. Srini: Shall we

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where to put UI items for templates (Bug #127529)

2007-02-22 Thread Sankar P
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 13:32 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 00:38 -0700, Sankar P wrote: If all you need is just a non-deleting draft, you can use Edit as new message. I have felt that this shouldn't be restricted to Sent-items alone as we allow configurable

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Where to put UI items for templates (Bug #127529)

2007-02-22 Thread Sankar P
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:15 -0600, Matthew Martin wrote: On 2/16/07, Sankar P [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 16:59 -0600, Matthew Martin wrote: I'm working on templates for evolution. I need to know where to put all the UI items for templates. There would need to be a save

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Why is GnomePrintContext still in GtkHtml?

2007-02-22 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le jeudi 22 février 2007 à 13:46 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit : Hi Frederic, We did update the GtkHTML versions under the assumptions of API extensions in 3.13.90. In 3.13.91 we have broken API/ABI and removed the obsolete APIs but we havent bumped the versions accordingly. We will be

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-02-22 Thread Seb James
Hi Philip, I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just been busy with other things. On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [snip] If you want to implement a specialised version for spool folders, fill in the function pointer like this: (in

Re: [Evolution-hackers] camel local provider and Bug 213072

2007-02-22 Thread Seb James
On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 22:52 +, Seb James wrote: Hi Philip, I've not done any work on this recently, but I've not forgotten it; just been busy with other things. On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 05:44 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote: [snip] If you want to implement a specialised version for spool

Re: [Evolution-hackers] evolution releases and intltool brokeness

2007-02-22 Thread guenther
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 00:51 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Hi list, while preparing ebuilds for gentoo gnome-experimental overlay, I came across a fix that was present since... who knows (years???). It's a simple call to intltoolize --force. What for ? To fix the sources released

[Evolution-hackers] Mail corruption (was: Re: evolution releases and intltool brokeness)

2007-02-22 Thread guenther
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 00:58 +0100, guenther wrote: [...] Cc'ing Harish (tarball pushing) and Srini (release announcements), since I don't know who exactly does the packaging. I know I did, and according to my Sent mail folder I am not totally nuts. However, the post that reached this list got