[Evolution-hackers] [PATCH][RFC] Deal with negative intervals

2011-02-21 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
Hi, Dealing with the error I posted about on another thread, I found that Google is giving me some recurring events with an interval of -1, which causes evo to search for all years from 2011 to -1, when it errors out because it's no longer a valid time_t (which I guess also explains why it

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution requesting info on every year from 2011 down to 65535

2011-02-21 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 14:08 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 08:21 +0100, Milan Crha wrote: On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 00:48 +0100, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote: I've attached the backtrace for a year of 167 (I think) though I don't think it gives much information. This

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution requesting info on every year from 2011 down to 65535

2011-02-21 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 11:30 +1300, Andrew McMillan wrote: [...] Hi Carlos, From RFC5545: The INTERVAL rule part contains a positive integer representing at which intervals the recurrence rule repeats. The default value is 1, meaning every second for a SECONDLY rule,