On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:30 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm still trying to find my footing here, the migration guide
and new documentation on ESourceRegistry don't seem to outline
how a new addressbook is actually created.
i.e. if I wanted to test a specific addressbook backend,
I
On 10/02/2012 01:30 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
On 10/01/2012 09:08 PM, Dan Vrátil wrote:
On Monday 01 of October 2012 20:41:07 Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Hi,
It's recently come to my attention that a vast API break[0] has
been introduced in the last (3.6) cycle of EDS.
Unfortunately
On 10/02/2012 08:29 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:30 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
I'm still trying to find my footing here, the migration guide
and new documentation on ESourceRegistry don't seem to outline
how a new addressbook is actually created.
i.e. if I wanted to
git head compiles, but appears to faile to start due to missing
spam[cd]-binary keys in org.gnome.evolution.spamassassin.gschema.xml.
reid
___
evolution-hackers mailing list
evolution-hackers@gnome.org
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:24 +, Reid Thompson wrote:
git head compiles, but appears to faile to start due to missing
spam[cd]-binary keys in org.gnome.evolution.spamassassin.gschema.xml.
reid
follow on note -- evo built with --disable-spamassassin
On Tuesday 02 of October 2012 13:25:36 Reid Thompson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 13:24 +, Reid Thompson wrote:
git head compiles, but appears to faile to start due to missing
spam[cd]-binary keys in org.gnome.evolution.spamassassin.gschema.xml.
reid
follow on note -- evo built
On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 15:36 +0200, Dan Vrátil wrote:
Can you please open a new bug report in bugzilla and provide more detailed
information, including backtrace (if appliable) and console output?
Thanks,
Dan
done
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685288
thanks,
reid
