Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-19 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi, On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 21:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote: > On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > > > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > > > > > Thanks, do

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-16 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 08:55 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > > Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > > > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with > ntlm? > What

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-15 Thread Free Ekanayaka
> Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was > no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. > Thanks, do you know of any documentation about using evolution with ntlm? Ciao, Free ___ Evolution-ha

Re: [Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-15 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Evo ldap backend was nothing but, openldap patched ntlm. But there was no update to it, as most distros patch OpenLDAP with ntlm and ship it. On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:12 +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote: > Hi all, > > has anybody used the evoldap backend to set up a default LDAP > address book? > > 

[Evolution-hackers] Evolution LDAP backend

2008-05-15 Thread Free Ekanayaka
Hi all, has anybody used the evoldap backend to set up a default LDAP address book? The LDAP backend for evolution mail accounts works great, I just followed the instructions here: http://live.gnome.org/Evolution_2fGConfLDAPBackend and everything worked as expected. However I was not able to