Camel makes some aggressive memory segmentation happen when loading
the folder summary.
This fixes that.
This is NOT yet the mmap() idea. That will come later.
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
for another project...
This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 20:31 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
Camel
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
for another project...
This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 21:32 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
for another project...
This
В Чтв, 06/07/2006 в 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof пишет:
Tinymail depends on Camel. Camel gets shipped with e-d-s. Tinymail
doesn't use *any* of the other e-d-s softwares, libraries nor its data.
I don't see a problem; you can always split the e-d-s install into
several packages. For RPM this is
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:47 +0400, Mikhail Zabaluev wrote:
В Чтв, 06/07/2006 в 21:23 +0200, Philip Van Hoof пишет:
Tinymail depends on Camel. Camel gets shipped with e-d-s. Tinymail
doesn't use *any* of the other e-d-s softwares, libraries nor its data.
I don't see a problem; you can
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:22 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
for another project...
This
On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 15:18 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
For some strange reason I thought the pstring stuff already did that,
oops. I guess I was thinking of similar code I wrote a few years back
for another project...
This patch does it the way I had done it in another project of mine
