Re: [Evolution-hackers] Proposed fix for bug 311512

2007-04-09 Thread Karl Relton
Matthew

As a new Mail maintainer, could you take a look at my proposed patches
for fixing bug 311512. Srini has had a look, and noted the ABI breakage
(see below). This was deliberate on my part - the only way to get
newmail notification to take note of the results of a filter thread.

Many thanks
Karl

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 12:43 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
 On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 07:51 +0100, Karl Relton wrote:
  Last week I posted two patches (one for eds, one for evo) on evo bugzill
  that I believe fix bug 311512.
 
  --- camel-folder.h.110  2007-03-20 16:57:40.0 +
  +++ camel-folder.h  2007-03-20 16:50:34.0 +
  @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ typedef struct {
  void (*freeze)(CamelFolder *folder);
  void (*thaw)  (CamelFolder *folder);
  gboolean (*is_frozen) (CamelFolder *folder);
  +   int  (*get_filter_thread) (CamelFolder *folder);
   } CamelFolderClass;
 
 On first look, I noticed that your patch has introduced an ABI break in
 CamelFolderClass. 
 
 I'm sure that the mailer hackers would have a more closer look at it. 
 
 Thanks for your friendly poke :-) 
 
 -Srini.
 
  f
  Could you take a look - any comments are welcome!
  


___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


Re: [Evolution-hackers] UAM

2007-04-09 Thread Srinivasa Ragavan
Hi Diego,

I have created a page in the wiki to capture the discussions around UAM
http://www.go-evolution.org/UAM

I have added few most important points that should be covered part of
UAM. Other hackers would be updating the wiki directly. I feel that you
can start looking into the first bullet which can help you understand
what the rest of the bullets are. Im sure that you have touched some
part of the dialog separation already. IMHO it might not be a huge
effort to do the actual implementation, but would require a very careful
design.

Feel free to ping me on irc. Im 'srag' on #evolution.

-Srini.

On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 21:53 +0200, Diego González wrote:
 On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 01:20 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
  Hi Diego,
  
  IIRC UAM targets removing ESources and merging them with EAccount. The
  way calendar, addressbook creation would change wrt groupwise, exchange.
  When taking these up, it has to be taken with a larger vision. I think
  the idea of moving the account setup as a capplet/application sounds
  nice, but I feel that first let us discuss out the approach/design
  before you implement it. It would surely save lots of effort. 
  
  Sankar/Varadhan/Harish: Can guys share your thoughts here?
 
 I didn't know how you envisioned wanted this UAM to work, so i just did
 this to use it as a base for further development.
 
 Actually your email previous email was the first news that i had about a
 UAM, i don't even know what the requirements for it are
 
 Diego
 

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers


[Evolution-hackers] triggering a receiving automatically

2007-04-09 Thread Joachim Kluge
I have Xubuntu Edgy and spool my mail via getmail to /var/mail. The app
mail-notification notifies my instantly of new mails with the help of
FAM (File Alteration Monitor). But how can I make Evolution to fetch new
mails without manual interaction without constant polling? E.g. per
D-Bus or script?

Thanks, Joachim Kluge

___
Evolution-hackers mailing list
Evolution-hackers@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-hackers