Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like
buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars,
contacts)
In few themes, Ive seen that it looks like a table header, but not in
all
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it
doesn't understand _ markup.
I think that can be moved to GtkTreeView and shouldn't have
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like
buttons) in 2.10 and not the other views as well (memos, calendars,
contacts)
In few
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:38 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:24 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
Last point is, why is the mail view headers fixed (like not look like
buttons) in 2.10 and not the
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 07:19 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 00:17 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
First thing that hit me was that it didn't use GtkTreeView and that it
doesn't understand _
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
I've seen that too, but the point was more: Why are the message view
headers looking different
Hi friends,
It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins
Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on
IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author and
the maintainer of evolution-scalix and the CalDAV provider for
Evolution.
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:32 +, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hi friends,
It is with immense pleasure I announce that Christian Kellner joins
Chenthill as Calendar Maintainer. He is popularly known as gicmo on
IRC. Gicmo is already the maintainer of gnome-vfs. He is the author and
the
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:55 +0300, Ross Burton wrote:
The need for a cast is part of the (IMHO wrong) design of libxml2, the
policy is that the libxml2 API requires UTF-8 strings, so they typedef
xmlChar to unsigned char*. Application writers are then meant to run
all strings through UTF-8
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have
an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and
messages (the largest folder has 300,000 messages; my INBOX
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:00 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:19 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 31 mai 2007 à 08:59 +, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 10:36 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
I've seen that too, but the point
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have
an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I have
an IMAP mailbox which is very large, both in terms of folders (over 100) and
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I
have
an
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I
have
an IMAP
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am thinking
of
doing a bit more to see if I can get it working OK for my situation. I
have
an IMAP
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
[Ross] What version to start with?
I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the
most recent stable release.
Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the corresponding tag to use for
evolution-data-server?
--
Ross
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:22 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:14 +0530, Srinivasa Ragavan wrote:
[Ross] What version to start with?
I would prefer, if you can try it with Evolution 2.10.2. It is the
most recent stable release.
Is EVOLUTION_DATA_SERVER_1_10_2 the
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has evo
2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago
some of the Debian packagers were interested in making a more recent
version).
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 13:38 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 16:10 -0400, Matthew Barnes wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has
evo
2.6. I notice that's a bit dated
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 11:38 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:10 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
Hi. I've been getting into the code of evolution recently, and am
thinking of
doing a bit more to see if I can get
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has
evo
2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did see that a few months ago
some of the Debian packagers were
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently has
evo
2.6. I notice that's a bit dated (although I did
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:22 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
That sounds as if no upgrade of other apps would be forced.
Or did you mean the stuff the evolution and gtk+ depends on would all
need to go to newer versions? That's probably a lot of stuff, but it's
not so bad.
Hard to predict. You can
2007/5/31, Ross Boylan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 23:20 +0200, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
2007/5/31, Matthew Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 07:58 -0700, Ross Boylan wrote:
What version to start with? I'm on Debian GNU/Linux, which currently
has evo
25 matches
Mail list logo
